Who Became Financially Vulnerable After COVID-19? A Population-Level Machine Learning Analysis Using MEPS Data
This study examines healthcare financial vulnerability before and after the COVID-19 pandemic using MEPS data from 2019 and 2021. High financial burden was defined as out-of-pocket spending exceeding 10% of family income. Poverty status, insurance coverage, and prescription drug spending were strongly associated with vulnerability. Models trained on pre-pandemic data showed only modest performance declines when applied to post-pandemic data, indicating stable predictors.
-->
COVID-19 e-print
Important: e-prints posted on arXiv are not peer-reviewed by arXiv; they should not be relied upon without context to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field.
[Submitted on 16 Jul 2026]
Title:Who Became Financially Vulnerable After COVID-19? A Population-Level Machine Learning Analysis Using MEPS Data
View a PDF of the paper titled Who Became Financially Vulnerable After COVID-19? A Population-Level Machine Learning Analysis Using MEPS Data, by Alexey Kresin and 8 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The cost of healthcare remains a concern in the United States and may have been influenced by disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines healthcare financial vulnerability before and after the pandemic using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2019 and 2021. High financial burden was defined as out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures exceeding 10% of family income. Survey-weighted subgroup analyses were performed to obtain nationally representative estimates across demographic and socioeconomic groups.
Descriptive analyses were complemented by interpretable logistic regression and machine learning models. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios, while random forest and gradient boosting models were used to evaluate predictive performance. Temporal generalization assessed whether models trained on pre-pandemic data remained predictive when applied to post-pandemic observations.
Financial vulnerability was strongly associated with poverty status, insurance coverage, and prescription drug spending. Subgroup analyses indicated persistent disparities across population groups, with some evidence of increased burden among vulnerable populations in 2021. Despite these differences, models trained on pre-pandemic data exhibited only modest reductions in predictive performance when evaluated on post-pandemic data, suggesting that the principal predictors of healthcare financial vulnerability remained relatively stable over time.
These findings provide a population-level assessment of healthcare financial vulnerability during the COVID-19 period and demonstrate the value of combining interpretable statistical modeling with machine learning for population health research. The results may support future population health surveillance, risk stratification, and healthcare policy research aimed at reducing financial barriers to care.
Comments: 14 pages, 3 figures
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.15446 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.15446v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15446
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Alexey Kresin [view email] [v1] Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:38:26 UTC (1,486 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Who Became Financially Vulnerable After COVID-19? A Population-Level Machine Learning Analysis Using MEPS Data, by Alexey Kresin and 8 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)