When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models
This study investigates how LLMs exhibit cultural bias by favoring global narratives over local contexts, introducing the concept of 'global narrative dominance'. Using the CulturalNB dataset for Bangla, they find that English questions increase global substitution and institutional framing, reducing local perspective coverage. Local evidence improves consistency but does not eliminate epistemic shifts.
[2605.30481] When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models
[Submitted on 28 May 2026]
Title:When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models
View a PDF of the paper titled When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models, by Md Arid Hasan and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as cross-lingual knowledge interfaces. However, culturally grounded questions often reflect globally dominant narratives rather than local contexts. We study this failure mode as \textit{global narrative dominance} in Bangla, a low-resource cultural context. We introduce \texttt{CulturalNB}, a dataset of 717 manually curated Bengali cultural instances with parallel Bangla--English question--answer pairs and supporting evidence, metadata, and sociocultural annotations. Using question-only and evidence-based prompting, we evaluate nine state-of-the-art LLMs with human and two independent LLM judges across metrics for cross-lingual consistency, language anchoring, global substitution, institutional bias, and epistemic perspective coverage. Results show that questions asked in English systematically increase global substitution and institutional framing while reducing local perspective coverage. Local evidence improves factual consistency and perspective coverage, but does not eliminate language-induced epistemic shifts. These findings suggest that cultural failures in LLMs are not only missing-knowledge errors but also failures of grounding and narrative prioritization.
Comments: Submitted to ARR
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
MSC classes: 68T50
ACM classes: F.2.2; I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2605.30481 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.30481v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.30481
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Md Arid Hasan [view email] [v1] Thu, 28 May 2026 18:58:32 UTC (3,998 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models, by Md Arid Hasan and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)