跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.05508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result is that performance improves as options are added. We explain that result, with theory and experiment. First, the termination rule option-critic learns by maximising return contributes nothing. When the termination test and the policy that picks options read the same values, the test fires at every step, so the learned rule is identical to always terminating. When that policy explores and the test does not, as in option-critic itself, the rule can block the exploration; there are instances where it suffers $\Omega(T)$ regret while always terminating holds to $O(\log T)$. Forcing termina…

來源arXiv Machine Learning作者: Bingyun Liu, Yuheng Jing
待翻譯:When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 30 Aug 2026] Title:When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic View a PDF of the paper titled When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic, by Bingyun Liu and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result is that performance improves as options are added. We explain that result, with theory and experiment. First, the termination rule option-critic learns by maximising return contributes nothing. When the termination test and the policy that picks options read the same values, the test fires at every step, so the learned rule is identical to always terminating. When that policy explores and the test does not, as in option-critic itself, the rule can block the exploration; there are instances where it suffers $\Omega(T)$ regret while always terminating holds to $O(\log T)$. Forcing termination at every step leaves the option-count curve intact. Second, the policy inside an option barely explores at all, so a state locks onto the first action that looked good and never updates again. We name this policy necrosis, give a state-level test for it, and find three fifths of states necrotic in a typical option. Restoring exploration repairs those states, and one option then solves the task. Third, extra options improve no option; what falls is the chance that all of them fail in the same state, from $59\\%$ to $4\\%$, and performance follows that joint quantity. Comments: First two authors contributed equally Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.05508 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2609.05508v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05508 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yuheng Jing [view email] [v1] Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:02:59 UTC (244 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic, by Bingyun Liu and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

研究者進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2609.05508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result i…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。