Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic

Summary

arXiv:2609.05508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result is that performance improves as options are added. We explain that result, with theory and experiment. First, the termination rule option-critic learns by maximising return contributes nothing. When the termination test and the policy that picks options read the same values, the test fires at every step, so the learned rule is identical to always terminating. When that policy explores and the test does not, as in option-critic itself, the rule can block the exploration; there are instances where it suffers $\Omega(T)$ regret while always terminating holds to $O(\log T)$. Forcing termination at every step leaves th…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Bingyun Liu, Yuheng Jing
When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Aug 2026]

Title:When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic

View a PDF of the paper titled When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic, by Bingyun Liu and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result is that performance improves as options are added. We explain that result, with theory and experiment. First, the termination rule option-critic learns by maximising return contributes nothing. When the termination test and the policy that picks options read the same values, the test fires at every step, so the learned rule is identical to always terminating. When that policy explores and the test does not, as in option-critic itself, the rule can block the exploration; there are instances where it suffers $\Omega(T)$ regret while always terminating holds to $O(\log T)$. Forcing termination at every step leaves the option-count curve intact. Second, the policy inside an option barely explores at all, so a state locks onto the first action that looked good and never updates again. We name this policy necrosis, give a state-level test for it, and find three fifths of states necrotic in a typical option. Restoring exploration repairs those states, and one option then solves the task. Third, extra options improve no option; what falls is the chance that all of them fail in the same state, from $59\\%$ to $4\\%$, and performance follows that joint quantity.

Comments: First two authors contributed equally

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.05508 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.05508v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05508

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yuheng Jing [view email] [v1] Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:02:59 UTC (244 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic, by Bingyun Liu and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.05508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result i…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.