When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs
A new study introduces ACE, an evaluation framework that controls for accuracy differences when comparing LLM calibration, revealing that many previously observed calibration advantages vanish and rankings can reverse.
-->
[Submitted on 29 Jun 2026]
Title:When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs
View a PDF of the paper titled When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs, by Zhichao Yang and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Calibration evaluates whether a model confidence aligns with its empirical accuracy. Existing studies often compare the calibration of different large language models using global calibration metrics such as Expected Calibration Error and Brier Score. We begin by showing, both theoretically and empirically, that such comparisons are confounded by differences in model accuracy. For fairer cross-model comparison, we then propose ACE, an accuracy-controlled evaluation framework with three complementary views: Instance-Aligned, Distribution-Aligned, and Candidate-Aligned calibration. Across multiple benchmarks, model families, and confidence elicitation methods, we use ACE to study two practically important comparison axes, small versus large models and thinking versus non-thinking models. We find that many previously reported calibration advantages under raw global metrics weaken substantially after accuracy control. We also find that ranking reversal is frequent: models favored by raw metrics often cease to be favored once accuracy is controlled. Our results show that raw global calibration metrics are not robust for cross-model comparison, and that fair calibration comparison requires accuracy-aware evaluation.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.30814 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.30814v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.30814
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Ruihan Yang [view email] [v1] Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:37:48 UTC (9,358 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs, by Zhichao Yang and 5 other authors
View PDF
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)