Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value

Summary

arXiv:2610.06992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Improved traffic forecasts do not necessarily yield better signal-control decisions. We investigate this gap through a layered diagnostic study using 29 days of reconstructed demand from Xuancheng, China, with seven dates reserved for testing. The framework evaluates point forecasts, conformal intervals, dependence-aware scenarios, and matched closed-loop controllers. Entry-level and movement-level forecasts reduce mean absolute error by 4.03% and 3.92%, respectively, relative to historical means. A nominal 90% conformal interval achieves 90.72% marginal coverage but only 75.66% on an ex-post high-demand subset. Interface audits identify decision-time leakage and reveal that only two of nine controlled intersections offer multiple effective…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Jianing Long, Xiaobin Li, Wuming Lei, Weiguang Wang
When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Oct 2026]

Title:When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value

View a PDF of the paper titled When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value, by Jianing Long and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Improved traffic forecasts do not necessarily yield better signal-control decisions. We investigate this gap through a layered diagnostic study using 29 days of reconstructed demand from Xuancheng, China, with seven dates reserved for testing. The framework evaluates point forecasts, conformal intervals, dependence-aware scenarios, and matched closed-loop controllers. Entry-level and movement-level forecasts reduce mean absolute error by 4.03% and 3.92%, respectively, relative to historical means. A nominal 90% conformal interval achieves 90.72% marginal coverage but only 75.66% on an ex-post high-demand subset. Interface audits identify decision-time leakage and reveal that only two of nine controlled intersections offer multiple effective actions. We correct the temporal interface and compare causal forecasts with a five-second event oracle using exhaustive joint-action search. A synthetic positive control demonstrates that future information can reduce the internal rollout cost by 61.5%. On the frozen test dates, however, causal forecasts and the event oracle increase queue vehicle?seconds by 6.09% and 3.39% relative to the matched no-future rollout, while the oracle reduces spillback exposure by 3.78%; paired-day bootstrap intervals cross zero. These findings indicate that forecast value depends on temporal observability, action identifiability, dynamics consistency, and objective alignment. The proposed protocol provides a practical way to diagnose where predictive improvements fail to translate into operational benefits.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.06992 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.06992v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06992

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xiaobin Li [view email] [v1] Sun, 4 Oct 2026 07:39:32 UTC (430 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value, by Jianing Long and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.06992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Improved traffic forecasts do not necessarily yield better signal-control decisions. We investigate this gap through a layered diag…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.