Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

What Improves Multimodal Misinformation Detection? Answers from a Large-Scale Empirical Study

Summary

arXiv:2609.30402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal misinformation is increasingly crafted to look convincing by pairing a textual claim with an image that appears to "prove" it. Yet in practice, building effective detectors often hinges on a small set of design choices that are rarely examined in a controlled way. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale study of multimodal design choices for misinformation detection with over 3,375 experiments- spanning three benchmark datasets and a broad range of pre-trained vision and language backbones. Through systematic comparisons and targeted robustness analyses, we distill practical guidance on which design choices help, when do they fail silently, and what aspects of the pipeline most strongly shape model behavior, answering 4 key Resear…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Akshit Sharma, Prashant W. Patil
What Improves Multimodal Misinformation Detection? Answers from a Large-Scale Empirical Study
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026]

Title:What Improves Multimodal Misinformation Detection? Answers from a Large-Scale Empirical Study

View a PDF of the paper titled What Improves Multimodal Misinformation Detection? Answers from a Large-Scale Empirical Study, by Akshit Sharma and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multimodal misinformation is increasingly crafted to look convincing by pairing a textual claim with an image that appears to "prove" it. Yet in practice, building effective detectors often hinges on a small set of design choices that are rarely examined in a controlled way. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale study of multimodal design choices for misinformation detection with over 3,375 experiments- spanning three benchmark datasets and a broad range of pre-trained vision and language backbones. Through systematic comparisons and targeted robustness analyses, we distill practical guidance on which design choices help, when do they fail silently, and what aspects of the pipeline most strongly shape model behavior, answering 4 key Research Questions (RQs). We aim to provide a reliable foundation for designing stronger and more dependable multimodal misinformation detection systems, thus contributing to the broader research community.

Comments: Accepted at the Tenth Widening NLP Workshop (WiNLP), co-located with EMNLP 2026

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multimedia (cs.MM)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.30402 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.30402v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30402

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Akshit Sharma [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:06:53 UTC (8,194 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled What Improves Multimodal Misinformation Detection? Answers from a Large-Scale Empirical Study, by Akshit Sharma and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CL cs.LG cs.MM

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.30402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal misinformation is increasingly crafted to look convincing by pairing a textual claim with an image that appears to "prov…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.