Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs

Summary

An arXiv study makes ontology checkers the object of study, comparing curated, LLM-generated, and data-derived ontologies as judges of LLM agent answers over knowledge graphs. It finds that on UniProt, a curated ontology flags more correct answers than alternatives, but on real agent answers its flags are only marginally more precise than random.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Michal Orzechowski, Rund Tawfiq, Tomasz Kosciolek
What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 27 Oct 2026]

Title:What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs

View a PDF of the paper titled What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs, by Michal Orzechowski and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM agents that answer questions over Web knowledge graphs are increasingly wrapped in checks derived from the graph's ontology, on the assumption that a formal schema makes a reliable judge. Yet a checker can be wrong as well: it can miss errors, and it can flag correct answers and push the agent into "fixing" them. Whether a curated ontology is worth its cost as such a judge, and how it compares with an ontology an LLM writes or a schema mined from the data, is unknown. We make the checker itself the object of study. Across curated, LLM-generated and data-derived ontologies, used as prompt context, as a checker, or both, and across open-weight and proprietary agents on public graphs and a private graph of nearly $10^{9}$ triples, we account for what ontology-derived checks catch and what they wrongly flag. We show how each source trades caught errors against false alarms, how a curated schema used as published can contradict its own data, which errors structural checks miss, and whether combining sources or giving the agent the checker's specific feedback pays off. On UniProt, the curated ontology flags more correct answers than either an ontology derived from the data or one an LLM derives from a summary of the data with masked identifiers. On real agent answers, its flags are only marginally more precise than random flags.

Comments: 13 pages, 2 figures. Under review

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Databases (cs.DB)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.37809 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.37809v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.37809

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michal Orzechowski [view email] [v1] Tue, 27 Oct 2026 18:27:45 UTC (54 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs, by Michal Orzechowski and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.DB

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • The study systematically compares curated, LLM-generated, and data-derived ontologies as checkers for LLM agents over knowledge graphs.
  • Curated ontologies flag more correct answers on UniProt, but their precision on real agent answers is only slightly better than random.
  • Checkers can miss errors and falsely flag correct answers, potentially pushing agents to make unnecessary corrections.
  • Experiments span open-weight and proprietary agents on public graphs and a private graph of nearly 10^9 triples.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs | AI News Hub