AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

What Do Audio-Visual Synchronization Metrics Actually Measure?

arXiv:2608.25157v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic AV-sync metrics are widely used to rank and train audio-visual generators, but they are rarely audited as measurement instruments. We jointly audit AV-Align, ImageBind AV-relevance, JavisScore, and Synchformer/DeSync under a common reliability protocol: controlled-distortion monotonicity, preprocessing sensitivity, rank uncertainty, cross-metric agreement, PEAVS-proxy agreement, and learned fusion. The result is an axis split, not a single winner: Synchformer/DeSync is the strongest temporal-offset tracker ($\tau=0.84$), ImageBind/JavisScore better match the PEAVS human-aligned proxy ($\tau=0.20$) and content-disruption families, and AV-Align is the weakest standalone metric. The metrics mutually disagree (Krippendorff $\alpha=0.066$), and neither linear nor simple $k$-NN fusion improves PEAVS agreement over the best individual metric. We recommend reporting AV-sync as a Reliability Card (metric-family breakdowns with confidence intervals) rather than a single bare synchronization score.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jai Kumar Sharma, Peeyush Tapadiya

-->

[Submitted on 25 Aug 2026]

Title:What Do Audio-Visual Synchronization Metrics Actually Measure?

View a PDF of the paper titled What Do Audio-Visual Synchronization Metrics Actually Measure?, by Jai Kumar Sharma and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Automatic AV-sync metrics are widely used to rank and train audio-visual generators, but they are rarely audited as measurement instruments. We jointly audit AV-Align, ImageBind AV-relevance, JavisScore, and Synchformer/DeSync under a common reliability protocol: controlled-distortion monotonicity, preprocessing sensitivity, rank uncertainty, cross-metric agreement, PEAVS-proxy agreement, and learned fusion. The result is an axis split, not a single winner: Synchformer/DeSync is the strongest temporal-offset tracker ($\tau=0.84$), ImageBind/JavisScore better match the PEAVS human-aligned proxy ($\tau=0.20$) and content-disruption families, and AV-Align is the weakest standalone metric. The metrics mutually disagree (Krippendorff $\alpha=0.066$), and neither linear nor simple $k$-NN fusion improves PEAVS agreement over the best individual metric. We recommend reporting AV-sync as a Reliability Card (metric-family breakdowns with confidence intervals) rather than a single bare synchronization score.

Comments: Accepted at the ECCV 2026 Workshop on Generative AI for Audio-Visual Content Creation (Gen4AVC), poster presentation; non-archival workshop. 7 pages (4-page main text + references + 2-page appendix), 3 figures, 8 tables. Project page: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Multimedia (cs.MM); Sound (cs.SD)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.25157 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.25157v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25157

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jai Kumar Sharma [view email] [v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 21:08:24 UTC (175 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled What Do Audio-Visual Synchronization Metrics Actually Measure?, by Jai Kumar Sharma and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs cs.MM cs.SD

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)