Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models

Summary

arXiv:2609.22293v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) and vision-language-action models (VLAs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. There, a small perturbation to the recorded camera image may change a decision significantly. However, existing benchmarks for these models only sample perturbations, which does not guarantee the absence of a failure in the untested region. We present the first robustness validation of six VLMs (drawn from the Gemma, InternVL, LLaVA, and Qwen families) and five VLAs (drawn from the GR00T, OpenVLA, and $\pi$ families) over entire continuous regions of photometric and geometric image perturbation: brightness shifts, camera rotations, and their composition. To this end, we build on the validation framework H$^2$V and intr…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Bogdan Aron, Christopher Brix, Benedikt Br\"uckner, Yanghao Zhang, Panagiotis Kouvaros, Alessio Lomuscio
Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 14 Sep 2026]

Title:Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models, by Bogdan Aron and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) and vision-language-action models (VLAs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. There, a small perturbation to the recorded camera image may change a decision significantly. However, existing benchmarks for these models only sample perturbations, which does not guarantee the absence of a failure in the untested region. We present the first robustness validation of six VLMs (drawn from the Gemma, InternVL, LLaVA, and Qwen families) and five VLAs (drawn from the GR00T, OpenVLA, and $\pi$ families) over entire continuous regions of photometric and geometric image perturbation: brightness shifts, camera rotations, and their composition. To this end, we build on the validation framework H$^2$V and introduce H$^2$V-M, a margin-aware convergence rule that makes validation affordable at the 32B parameter scale. We demonstrate that H$^2$V-M outperforms H$^2$V by an order of magnitude in model queries and that it finds counterexamples faster than random sampling while providing soundness guarantees. Our VLM and VLA robustness validation shows that robustness is mostly dependent on the perturbation type, rather than the model, and that VLMs are more robust to large camera rotations than VLAs. For VLAs, even perturbations as small as $\pm1^\circ$ can change the commanded action in many cases. We also show that robustness depends more on model family than on model size.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.22293 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.22293v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22293

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Christopher Brix [view email] [v1] Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:53:48 UTC (544 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models, by Bogdan Aron and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.22293v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) and vision-language-action models (VLAs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. There,…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.