Understanding Temporal Semantic Stability in Open-Vocabulary UAV Perception through Metric 3D Fusion
arXiv:2608.28665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent open-vocabulary segmentation models have advanced semantic perception for UAVs, but predictions from moving aerial platforms can remain temporally inconsistent across repeated observations of the same physical scene. We investigate temporal semantic stability by associating frame-wise predictions with persistent world-space locations through metric 3D fusion. We introduce a voxel-level evaluation framework that jointly characterises final semantic agreement, Semantic Belief Drift (SBD), Observation Persistence (OP), and semantic uncertainty. Experiments on UAVid-3D reveal substantial frame-wise semantic flicker and show that high aggregate world-space agreement can overstate temporal stability when locations have limited repeated-observation support. Persistence-stratified analysis shows that recurrent voxels expose greater semantic disagreement, while belief drift decreases as additional evidence accumulates. This behaviour is observed across two segmentation backbones and remains consistent under variations in voxel resolution, geometric association, and temporal sampling density. Conditions that reduce world-space recurrence can increase apparent aggregate stability, demonstrating that semantic consistency must be interpreted together with observation support. Our findings highlight observation persistence as an essential conditioning variable for evaluating long-horizon semantic reliability.
-->
[Submitted on 23 Aug 2026]
Title:Understanding Temporal Semantic Stability in Open-Vocabulary UAV Perception through Metric 3D Fusion
View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Temporal Semantic Stability in Open-Vocabulary UAV Perception through Metric 3D Fusion, by Saurbh Singh Jamwal
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recent open-vocabulary segmentation models have advanced semantic perception for UAVs, but predictions from moving aerial platforms can remain temporally inconsistent across repeated observations of the same physical scene. We investigate temporal semantic stability by associating frame-wise predictions with persistent world-space locations through metric 3D fusion. We introduce a voxel-level evaluation framework that jointly characterises final semantic agreement, Semantic Belief Drift (SBD), Observation Persistence (OP), and semantic uncertainty. Experiments on UAVid-3D reveal substantial frame-wise semantic flicker and show that high aggregate world-space agreement can overstate temporal stability when locations have limited repeated-observation support. Persistence-stratified analysis shows that recurrent voxels expose greater semantic disagreement, while belief drift decreases as additional evidence accumulates. This behaviour is observed across two segmentation backbones and remains consistent under variations in voxel resolution, geometric association, and temporal sampling density. Conditions that reduce world-space recurrence can increase apparent aggregate stability, demonstrating that semantic consistency must be interpreted together with observation support. Our findings highlight observation persistence as an essential conditioning variable for evaluating long-horizon semantic reliability.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.28665 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.28665v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28665
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Saurbh Singh Jamwal [view email] [v1] Sun, 23 Aug 2026 18:33:58 UTC (8,830 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Temporal Semantic Stability in Open-Vocabulary UAV Perception through Metric 3D Fusion, by Saurbh Singh Jamwal
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs cs.RO
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)