Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Transformers Learn Two Competing Sorting Algorithms, and Only One Length-Generalizes

Summary

arXiv:2610.26974v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We show that two-layer transformers trained to near-zero loss on a sorting task converge to one of two mechanistically distinct solution classes depending on their initialization. One solution class consists of solutions that do not use the second attention layer to sort, but also fail to length-generalize. The other, which uses both attention layers, length-generalizes perfectly, despite only being trained to sort sequences of a fixed length. By carefully choosing the weight initialization, we demonstrate that we can steer the model toward learning one solution or the other. We identify input types that are rare at the training length but increasingly common at longer sequence lengths as a source of this disparity in length-generalization,…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Khashayar Gatmiry, Nathan W. Henry, Chloe H. Su, Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Melanie Weber, Jonathan A. Kelner, Peter L. Bartlett
Transformers Learn Two Competing Sorting Algorithms, and Only One Length-Generalizes
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 18 Oct 2026]

Title:Transformers Learn Two Competing Sorting Algorithms, and Only One Length-Generalizes

View a PDF of the paper titled Transformers Learn Two Competing Sorting Algorithms, and Only One Length-Generalizes, by Khashayar Gatmiry and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We show that two-layer transformers trained to near-zero loss on a sorting task converge to one of two mechanistically distinct solution classes depending on their initialization. One solution class consists of solutions that do not use the second attention layer to sort, but also fail to length-generalize. The other, which uses both attention layers, length-generalizes perfectly, despite only being trained to sort sequences of a fixed length. By carefully choosing the weight initialization, we demonstrate that we can steer the model toward learning one solution or the other. We identify input types that are rare at the training length but increasingly common at longer sequence lengths as a source of this disparity in length-generalization, and find that layer-wise specialization of the second class of solutions allows them to handle these rare sequences more accurately. In the second class, we discover a mechanism by which the second layer attention can use the contextual information gathered by the first layer attention to reduce its search space. On the related task of finding the minimum of a sequence, we find a similar two solution-type phenomenon, but with the opposite generalization pattern, where a different form of layer-wise specialization causes the two-layer solution to length-generalize worse than the single-attention solution.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.26974 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.26974v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26974

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Huangyuan Su [view email] [v1] Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:21:16 UTC (21,550 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Transformers Learn Two Competing Sorting Algorithms, and Only One Length-Generalizes, by Khashayar Gatmiry and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.26974v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We show that two-layer transformers trained to near-zero loss on a sorting task converge to one of two mechanistically distinct sol…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.