AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

TraceCoder: Explainable and Auditable Code Generation with Position-Key Snippet Versioning

LLM-based coding agents produce black-box code with hidden rationale and ephemeral repair histories. TraceCoder introduces three complementary mechanisms—a relational snippet-history schema, a browser-based visualizer, and a fractional position-key indexing scheme—to make code generation auditable and replayable. Evaluated on 30 algorithmic tasks, it achieves 30% mean Chg% and traceable repair events for 30% of snippets.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Rwaida Alssadi, Muntaser Syed, Balaji Kasula, Lamine Deen, Majed Alotaibi, Mohammed Alghamdi, Tyler Ton, Ali Alqarni, Marius Silaghi

-->

[Submitted on 28 Jul 2026]

Title:TraceCoder: Explainable and Auditable Code Generation with Position-Key Snippet Versioning

View a PDF of the paper titled TraceCoder: Explainable and Auditable Code Generation with Position-Key Snippet Versioning, by Rwaida Alssadi and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Contemporary LLM-based coding agents produce code as black-box outputs: the rationale behind each line is hidden, the evolution of the code through benchmark-driven repair is ephemeral, and post-hoc auditing is impossible. We present a code generation concept that addresses these shortcomings through three complementary mechanisms: (i) a relational snippet-history schema that records, per repair event, the benchmark reference, round number, failure text, and LLM explanation, enabling full provenance queries; (ii) a browser-based visualisation tool that renders this history as heat-mapped, hover-annotated source code; and (iii) a competitive fractional position-key indexing scheme with tree-node delimiters that assigns stable, lexicographically-ordered identifiers to each code snippet, enabling fine-grained tracking without disrupting surrounding lines. We evaluate TraceCoder on 30 algorithmic programming tasks spanning string processing, mathematical computation, and data-structure manipulation, across two provider configurations. Of these, 10 exhaust the 6-iteration budget on tasks with subtle edge-case behaviour. Mean Chg% reaches 30%, three in ten code snippets carry a traceable repair-event row, compared to 21% when using Gemini 2.0 Flash as sole provider on a 20-task subset. Three detailed case studies demonstrate how the system explains which specific benchmark failures shaped each line of the final program. The proposed mechanism makes the internal "narrative" of automated code generation auditable and replayable, a property essential for trust and accountability in production deployments.

Comments: Submitted Version (version submitted on May deadline to AGENTICS 2026). Version of Record to appear in AGENTICS proceedings

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.26307 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.26307v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26307

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Marius Silaghi [view email] [v1] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:03:52 UTC (137 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled TraceCoder: Explainable and Auditable Code Generation with Position-Key Snippet Versioning, by Rwaida Alssadi and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.SE

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)