Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark

Summary

This paper presents a comprehensive survey and benchmark for face swapping. It organizes existing methods into five major paradigms and introduces CASIA FaceSwapping, a high-quality benchmark with balanced demographics and explicit attribute variations, along with standardized evaluation protocols. Extensive experiments provide new insights into current techniques' performance and limitations.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Qi Li, Weining Wang, Shuangjun Du, Bo Peng, Jing Dong, Kun Wang, Zhenan Sun, Ming-Hsuan Yang
Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.00883] Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.00883

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2605.00883 (cs)

[Submitted on 27 Apr 2026]

Title:Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark

Authors:Qi Li, Weining Wang, Shuangjun Du, Bo Peng, Jing Dong, Kun Wang, Zhenan Sun, Ming-Hsuan Yang

View a PDF of the paper titled Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark, by Qi Li and 7 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Face swapping has witnessed significant progress in recent years, largely driven by advances in deep generative models such as GANs and diffusion this http URL these advances, existing methods remain fragmented across different paradigms, and their evaluation is highly inconsistent due to the lack of standardized datasets and protocols. Moreover, prior surveys primarily focus on broader deepfake generation or detection, leaving face swapping insufficiently studied as a standalone problem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey and benchmark for face swapping. We provide a structured review of existing methods, organizing them into five major paradigms and systematically analyzing their design principles, strengths, and limitations. To enable fair and controlled evaluation, we introduce CASIA FaceSwapping, a high-quality benchmark with balanced demographic distributions and explicit attribute variations, and establish standardized protocols to assess the robustness of different face swapping methods. Extensive experiments on representative approaches yield new insights into the performance characteristics and limitations of current techniques. Overall, our work provides a unified perspective and a principled evaluation framework to facilitate the development of more robust and controllable face swapping methods. More results can be found at this https URL.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.00883 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.00883v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00883

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Qi Li [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:00:00 UTC (9,324 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark, by Qi Li and 7 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Systematically categorizes face swapping methods into five paradigms.
  • Introduces CASIA FaceSwapping benchmark with balanced demographics and attribute variations.
  • Establishes standardized evaluation protocols for fair comparison.
  • Reveals performance characteristics and limitations of current techniques through extensive experiments.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.