Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Tiny Recursive Policy: Recursive Latent Refinement for Visuomotor Control

Summary

Researchers introduce Tiny Recursive Policy (TRP), a parameter-efficient behavior-cloning policy that combines persistent temporal state with recursive latent refinement. TRP performs competitively on LIBERO-100, MetaWorld ML45, and LIBERO-Mem, with substantial gains on long-horizon and context-dependent tasks while using far fewer parameters than large generative baselines.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Hakan Aktas, Cengiz Oztireli
Tiny Recursive Policy: Recursive Latent Refinement for Visuomotor Control
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 23 Oct 2026]

Title:Tiny Recursive Policy: Recursive Latent Refinement for Visuomotor Control

View a PDF of the paper titled Tiny Recursive Policy: Recursive Latent Refinement for Visuomotor Control, by Hakan Aktas and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Behaviour cloning has become a powerful approach for robotic manipulation, but many modern policies reconstruct their internal representation from a fixed observation window at each prediction and do not maintain persistent latent context throughout execution. We introduce Tiny Recursive Policy (TRP), a parameter-efficient behaviour-cloning policy that combines persistent temporal state with recursive latent refinement. At each control step, TRP repeatedly updates high- and low-level latent states using a shared computation module before decoding an action sequence, and propagates the resulting state to subsequent predictions. We evaluate TRP across LIBERO-100, MetaWorld ML45, and the LIBERO-Mem benchmarks. TRP performs competitively across multi-task and few-shot settings and shows substantial gains on long-horizon and context-dependent tasks, while using significantly fewer parameters than large generative baselines. Execution-time perturbations show that reliance on the persistent carry increases with temporal-context demand, while training with carry perturbations substantially improves robustness to both carry and visual corruptions. Ablations reveal a strong interaction between persistent state and recursive refinement: the benefit of carry depends strongly on the amount of within-step computation, and the resulting performance cannot be explained by parameter count alone.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33288 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.33288v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33288

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hakan Aktas [view email] [v1] Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:54:54 UTC (340 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Tiny Recursive Policy: Recursive Latent Refinement for Visuomotor Control, by Hakan Aktas and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • TRP repeatedly updates high- and low-level latent states with a shared computation module at each control step, then propagates the resulting state to later predictions to maintain persistent latent context.
  • Across LIBERO-100, MetaWorld ML45, and LIBERO-Mem, TRP is competitive in multi-task and few-shot settings and shows substantial gains on long-horizon and context-dependent tasks with far fewer parameters than large generative baselines.
  • Execution-time perturbations show reliance on the persistent carry grows with temporal-context demand, and training with carry perturbations improves robustness to both carry and visual corruptions.
  • Ablations reveal a strong interaction between persistent state and recursive refinement: the benefit of carry depends heavily on within-step computation and cannot be explained by parameter count alone.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.