There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text
<p><strong><a href="https://sophiebits.com/2026/06/25/there-are-no-lossless-transformations-of-natural-language-text">There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text</a></strong></p> Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers". It's a short read (supporting its own recommendations) and really good.</p> <p>If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me:</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs</strong>. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it.” You will confuse your readers (and waste their time) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts.</p> </blockquote> <p>The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here:</p> <blockquote> <p>There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost.</p> </blockquote> <p>Tags: <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/writing">writing</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai">ai</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai">generative-ai</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms">llms</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai-misuse">ai-misuse</a></p>
There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text
Simon Willison’s Weblog
Subscribe
11th August 2026 - Link Blog
There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text. Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers". It's a short read (supporting its own recommendations) and really good.
If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me:
You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it.” You will confuse your readers (and waste their time) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts.
The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here:
There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost.
Recent articles
Now we have a timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face - 7th August 2026
One-shotting a Raccoon Heist game using Claude Fable 5 - 5th August 2026
New release of LLM adds support for reasoning traces, OpenAI Responses, server-side tools, and smarter logging - 4th August 2026
This is a link post by Simon Willison, posted on 11th August 2026.
writing 33
ai 2,182
generative-ai 1,933
llms 1,900
ai-misuse 61
Monthly briefing
Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments.
Pay me to send you less!
Sponsor & subscribe
Disclosures
Colophon
©
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026