Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Test-Time Adaptation of Manipulation Policies Under Actuator Degradation

Summary

arXiv:2609.36182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot manipulation policies are usually trained under the assumption that a commanded action produces the same motion as it did during training even after hours of operation. Real hardware violates this assumption as the motors gradually heat up, current saturates near contact, voltage sags under load, thus the same policy action can produce a weaker, delayed, or noisier motion. These conditions are already measured by onboard telemetry, such as joint temperature, motor current, and supply voltage, yet this signal is typically used only for logging or safety checks rather than policy adaptation. We introduce Telemetry-Aware Action Rectification (TeAR), a policy-agnostic method that turns a frozen manipulation policy into a telemetry-conditio…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Som Sagar, Ransalu Senanayake
Test-Time Adaptation of Manipulation Policies Under Actuator Degradation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 28 Sep 2026]

Title:Test-Time Adaptation of Manipulation Policies Under Actuator Degradation

View a PDF of the paper titled Test-Time Adaptation of Manipulation Policies Under Actuator Degradation, by Som Sagar and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Robot manipulation policies are usually trained under the assumption that a commanded action produces the same motion as it did during training even after hours of operation. Real hardware violates this assumption as the motors gradually heat up, current saturates near contact, voltage sags under load, thus the same policy action can produce a weaker, delayed, or noisier motion. These conditions are already measured by onboard telemetry, such as joint temperature, motor current, and supply voltage, yet this signal is typically used only for logging or safety checks rather than policy adaptation. We introduce Telemetry-Aware Action Rectification (TeAR), a policy-agnostic method that turns a frozen manipulation policy into a telemetry-conditioned policy by rectifying its outgoing action before it reaches the low-level controller. TeAR learns a lightweight Transformer that combines the proposed action with live actuator telemetry and amplifies, damps, or biases individual action components. We evaluate TeAR across 18 policy-task pairs spanning 8 policy families and 5 manipulation tasks. In an additional paired evaluation with degradation-model mismatch, TeAR achieves 31.8% success, compared with 25.6% for the base policy and 30.6% for an assumed-model inverse. On a physical arm, TeAR improves success under heating by 10-15% without on-robot fine-tuning.

Comments: 13 pages, 15 figures

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.36182 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.36182v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36182

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Som Sagar [view email] [v1] Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:49:27 UTC (5,176 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Test-Time Adaptation of Manipulation Policies Under Actuator Degradation, by Som Sagar and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.36182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot manipulation policies are usually trained under the assumption that a commanded action produces the same motion as it did dur…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.