Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Task-Aligned Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review and Practical Design Guidelines

Summary

This systematic review analyzes 75 studies on self-supervised learning (SSL) for medical imaging, categorizing methods into contrastive, predictive, generative, and hybrid paradigms. It finds no universal optimal SSL strategy; performance depends on alignment between pretext task, imaging modality, and target task. Contrastive methods suit classification but may miss subtle pathology; generative approaches preserve local anatomy for segmentation; hybrid methods offer balanced performance. Practical design guidelines and open challenges are outlined.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Chathura Wimalasiri
Task-Aligned Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review and Practical Design Guidelines
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.23995] Task-Aligned Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review and Practical Design Guidelines

[Submitted on 18 May 2026]

Title:Task-Aligned Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review and Practical Design Guidelines

View a PDF of the paper titled Task-Aligned Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review and Practical Design Guidelines, by Chathura Wimalasiri

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Self-supervised learning (SSL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for addressing the annotation bottleneck in medical imaging by learning representations from unlabeled data. However, its effectiveness depends heavily on the design of the pretext task and its alignment with the downstream clinical objective. We present a systematic, task-oriented review of SSL in medical imaging, examining how different pretext-task formulations influence performance across classification, segmentation, detection, and other tasks. Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyze 75 studies published between 2017 and 2025 and organize them into four paradigms: contrastive, non-contrastive and predictive, generative and reconstruction-based, and hybrid learning. Rather than cataloguing methods by architecture, we map each paradigm to the downstream objectives it best supports. Our analysis shows there is no universally optimal SSL strategy; instead, performance is governed by the alignment between the pretext task, the imaging modality, and the target task. Contrastive methods learn global discriminative features and align well with classification, but may overlook subtle pathological patterns. Generative and spatial prediction-based approaches better preserve local anatomical structure, making them more suitable for segmentation and other dense prediction tasks, while hybrid methods offer the most balanced performance. We further show that modality-specific design is critical and that SSL provides its greatest benefit in low-label and few-shot regimes. Finally, we distill these findings into practical design guidelines and outline open challenges, including pathology-aware pretext task design, resource-efficient training for high-dimensional data, and standardized evaluation protocols. This work offers practical guidance for designing more effective and clinically relevant SSL frameworks in medical imaging.

Comments: This manuscript is 31 pages with 4 tables and 3 figures

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

MSC classes: 68T07, 68T45, 92C55, 68-02

ACM classes: I.2.6; I.4.0; I.5.4; I.2.10

Cite as: arXiv:2605.23995 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.23995v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23995

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Kanakka Hewage Chathura Thimanka Wimalasiri [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 04:47:50 UTC (355 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Task-Aligned Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review and Practical Design Guidelines, by Chathura Wimalasiri

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • SSL effectiveness in medical imaging depends on pretext-task alignment with clinical objectives.
  • Contrastive methods are good for classification but may overlook subtle pathological patterns.
  • Generative and spatial prediction methods better preserve anatomical structures for dense tasks.
  • Hybrid approaches provide the most balanced performance, especially in low-label regimes.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.