Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns

Summary

arXiv:2609.38371v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing LLM-driven robot task planners rely on a taken-for-granted assumption of an ideal user whose instructions are clear, complete, and task-focused. However, when interacting with real-world users, especially those experiencing cognitive impairments, such as people living with dementia (PLWD), the planners often make mistakes and even pose physical safety risks. We proposed TALK-Dem (Talking Attributes and Linguistic Knowledge in Dementia), the first benchmark for evaluating LLM-driven robot task planning under dementia-associated verbal communication. TALK-Dem contains 4,800 instructions and covers five typical communication patterns, including Referential Imprecision, Object Substitution, Empty Speech, Topic Drift, and Intrusion, at t…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Guangxin Zhao, Yiran Hu, Yuan Cao, Chenxi Jiang, Jianfei Yang, Yegang Du, Yasuyuki Taki, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Lin Gu, Zhi Zheng
TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 29 Sep 2026]

Title:TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns

View a PDF of the paper titled TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns, by Guangxin Zhao and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Existing LLM-driven robot task planners rely on a taken-for-granted assumption of an ideal user whose instructions are clear, complete, and task-focused. However, when interacting with real-world users, especially those experiencing cognitive impairments, such as people living with dementia (PLWD), the planners often make mistakes and even pose physical safety risks. We proposed TALK-Dem (Talking Attributes and Linguistic Knowledge in Dementia), the first benchmark for evaluating LLM-driven robot task planning under dementia-associated verbal communication. TALK-Dem contains 4,800 instructions and covers five typical communication patterns, including Referential Imprecision, Object Substitution, Empty Speech, Topic Drift, and Intrusion, at three intensity levels. Experiments across six open-weight LLMs reveal a substantial robustness gap. Across communication patterns, open-weight models exhibited performance drops of up to 22.3 percentage points compared to ideal instructions. This revealed a critical gap and even danger for real-world applications, especially in assistive robotics, where locally deployable models are necessary due to privacy concerns and connectivity constraints. To mitigate this issue, we proposed the Context-Aware Retrieval from Experience (CARE) method, which retrieves relevant previously resolved tasks to provide task-specific interpretation and planning context. CARE generally outperformed standard prompting baselines across the six open-weight models, improving average task success by 18.1 percentage points over the vanilla prompt. These results highlighted the importance of both evaluating communication robustness and developing effective adaptation strategies for locally deployable assistive robots. The TALK-Dem dataset is publicly available at this https URL.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.38371 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.38371v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38371

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Guangxin Zhao [view email] [v1] Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:33:21 UTC (19,856 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns, by Guangxin Zhao and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.38371v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing LLM-driven robot task planners rely on a taken-for-granted assumption of an ideal user whose instructions are clear, compl…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.