AI News HubLIVE
原文

Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey

This survey explores how Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) effectively addresses multimodal learning challenges from three perspectives: efficient engine, representation learner, and adapter, while identifying research gaps.

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • MoE enables scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth.
  • MoE integrates complementary expert knowledge for enriched alignment and interaction representations.
  • MoE provides modular mechanisms for imperfect data scenarios like modality imbalance and missing modality.
  • The survey highlights gaps in interpretable routing, expert communication, modality integration, and lifelong multimodal learning.

Why it matters

This matters because moE enables scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth.

Technical impact

May affect model selection, inference cost, product capability, and evaluation benchmarks.

[2605.27431] Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey

[Submitted on 22 May 2026]

Title:Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey

View a PDF of the paper titled Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey, by Liangwei Nathan Zheng and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) presents a naturally compatible and scalable framework for multimodal learning, demonstrating strong adaptability across diverse modalities and tasks. Despite its growing success, a comprehensive and systematic review on the MoE metho addressing multimodal challenges remains lacking. Existing surveys tend to evaluate either multimodal learning or MoE independently from method taxonomy, overlooking the unique interplay between them. This survey fills that gap by answering a central question: \textit{How does MoE effectively resolve multimodal challenges?} We approach this from three key perspectives: (1) \textbf{MoE as an Efficient Multimodal Engine:} enabling scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth and mitigating modality redundancy through selective expert activation; (2) \textbf{MoE as a Multimodal Representation Learner:} integrating complementary multi-opinion expert knowledge to enrich alignment and interaction representations; and (3) \textbf{MoE as a Multimodal Adapter:} providing a modular and flexible mechanism to model imperfect data scenarios such as modality imbalance and missing modality. Through our extensive literature review, we identify critical research gaps, including interpretable routing, expert communication, modality integration, and lifelong multimodal learning. We position this survey as a foundation for future research toward interpretable and sustainable multimodal Mixture-of-Experts system.

Comments: This survey paper has just been accepted by IJCAI 2026. Results were released by 30 April 2026. As I could not find a particular place to drop the acceptance email. I have upload the acceptance email alongside the LaTeX files of the paper, named as this http URL

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.27431 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.27431v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27431

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Liangwei Zheng [view email] [v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 05:01:21 UTC (232 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey, by Liangwei Nathan Zheng and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)