Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey
This survey explores how Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) effectively addresses multimodal learning challenges from three perspectives: efficient engine, representation learner, and adapter, while identifying research gaps.
Article intelligence
Key points
- MoE enables scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth.
- MoE integrates complementary expert knowledge for enriched alignment and interaction representations.
- MoE provides modular mechanisms for imperfect data scenarios like modality imbalance and missing modality.
- The survey highlights gaps in interpretable routing, expert communication, modality integration, and lifelong multimodal learning.
Why it matters
This matters because moE enables scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth.
Technical impact
May affect model selection, inference cost, product capability, and evaluation benchmarks.
[2605.27431] Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey
[Submitted on 22 May 2026]
Title:Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey
View a PDF of the paper titled Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey, by Liangwei Nathan Zheng and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) presents a naturally compatible and scalable framework for multimodal learning, demonstrating strong adaptability across diverse modalities and tasks. Despite its growing success, a comprehensive and systematic review on the MoE metho addressing multimodal challenges remains lacking. Existing surveys tend to evaluate either multimodal learning or MoE independently from method taxonomy, overlooking the unique interplay between them. This survey fills that gap by answering a central question: \textit{How does MoE effectively resolve multimodal challenges?} We approach this from three key perspectives: (1) \textbf{MoE as an Efficient Multimodal Engine:} enabling scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth and mitigating modality redundancy through selective expert activation; (2) \textbf{MoE as a Multimodal Representation Learner:} integrating complementary multi-opinion expert knowledge to enrich alignment and interaction representations; and (3) \textbf{MoE as a Multimodal Adapter:} providing a modular and flexible mechanism to model imperfect data scenarios such as modality imbalance and missing modality. Through our extensive literature review, we identify critical research gaps, including interpretable routing, expert communication, modality integration, and lifelong multimodal learning. We position this survey as a foundation for future research toward interpretable and sustainable multimodal Mixture-of-Experts system.
Comments: This survey paper has just been accepted by IJCAI 2026. Results were released by 30 April 2026. As I could not find a particular place to drop the acceptance email. I have upload the acceptance email alongside the LaTeX files of the paper, named as this http URL
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27431 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.27431v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27431
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Liangwei Zheng [view email] [v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 05:01:21 UTC (232 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey, by Liangwei Nathan Zheng and 4 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)