Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

TabRank: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Table Re-Rankers

Summary

TabRank presents a framework for training reasoning rerankers for tabular retrieval by distilling chain-of-thought reasoning traces from Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). It achieves significant improvements across multiple datasets, with Acc@10 gains up to 52.9%, and demonstrates strong generalization to out-of-distribution and multi-table scenarios.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Adarsh Singh, Kushal Raj Bhandari, Jianxi Gao, Soham Dan, Vivek Gupta
TabRank: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Table Re-Rankers
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 28 Jul 2026]

Title:TabRank: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Table Re-Rankers

View a PDF of the paper titled TabRank: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Table Re-Rankers, by Adarsh Singh and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The ability to retrieve relevant tables for answering questions is a key task for structured information retrieval. Multi-stage retrieval systems rely heavily on rerankers to refine candidate lists produced by efficient first-stage retrievers. As a result, neural rerankers and LLM-based reranking methods have become increasingly important due to their superior capacity for semantic understanding and reasoning compared to conventional sparse or dense retrieval models. Recently, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) equipped with explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have shown strong improvements in ranking quality in unstructured passage retrieval. In this work, we present TabRank, a framework for training reasoning rerankers for Tabular Retrieval. We first present a comprehensive dataset of 6728 reasoning traces for tabular reranking on the Natural Questions Tables dataset. We then explore two variants of training a compact reasoning model on these reasoning traces: explicit CoT distillation and conditioning the student reranker on the teacher's reasoning trace within the prompt. We stress-test TabRank on several out-of-distribution generalization settings on diverse domains and multi-table scenarios. Our approach significantly improves performance across a variety of table retrieval datasets, increasing Acc@10 by 30.5% on HybridQA, 15.2% on SQA, 52.9% on TabFact, and 13.1% on TATQA subsets of the Multi-Table QA Benchmark compared to the base model. Notably, TabRank generalizes effectively to multi-table reasoning. Our code, data and models are available at this https URL

Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.25182 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.25182v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25182

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Adarsh Singh [view email] [v1] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:23:04 UTC (881 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled TabRank: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Table Re-Rankers, by Adarsh Singh and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.IR

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • First comprehensive dataset of 6,728 reasoning traces for tabular reranking on Natural Questions Tables
  • Explores two distillation variants: explicit CoT and conditioning on teacher's reasoning trace
  • Outperforms base model by 30.5% Acc@10 on HybridQA, 15.2% on SQA, 52.9% on TabFact, 13.1% on TATQA

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.