Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection

Summary

arXiv:2609.09349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern LLMs demonstrate impressive multilingual performance, yet standard benchmarks primarily reward selecting correct answers rather than evaluating genuine factual understanding. We introduce Systematic Wikidata-based Object-Relation Distortion (SWORD), a benchmark that evaluates whether models consistently reject factual errors across languages. SWORD generates syntactically well-formed but factually incorrect statements in eight widely spoken languages through controlled perturbations of Wikidata triples, ranging from random entity substitutions to semantically plausible property-based selections. Our distortion-based evaluation surfaces two critical insights that remain entirely obscured by conventional benchmarks. First, models counte…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Sanghyeok Park, Minji Kang, Hosung Kwak, Jinhyuk Yun
SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Sep 2026]

Title:SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection

View a PDF of the paper titled SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection, by Sanghyeok Park and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern LLMs demonstrate impressive multilingual performance, yet standard benchmarks primarily reward selecting correct answers rather than evaluating genuine factual understanding. We introduce Systematic Wikidata-based Object-Relation Distortion (SWORD), a benchmark that evaluates whether models consistently reject factual errors across languages. SWORD generates syntactically well-formed but factually incorrect statements in eight widely spoken languages through controlled perturbations of Wikidata triples, ranging from random entity substitutions to semantically plausible property-based selections. Our distortion-based evaluation surfaces two critical insights that remain entirely obscured by conventional benchmarks. First, models counterintuitively achieve higher accuracy on semantically plausible distortions than on nonsensical random substitutions, suggesting reliance on distributional familiarity rather than genuine factual verification. Second, models exhibiting comparable baseline accuracy across languages show substantial performance degradation specifically on (East) Asian languages when presented with distorted statements, with cross-lingual performance gaps reaching up to 28 percentage points (49\% relative reduction) in some models. These findings demonstrate that multilingual factual reasoning involves asymmetric capabilities that aggregate accuracy metrics systematically obscure.

Comments: 20 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables (including appendix)

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.09349 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.09349v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09349

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jinhyuk Yun [view email] [v1] Tue, 8 Sep 2026 18:39:01 UTC (863 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SWORD: Wikidata-based Distortions Reveal Hidden Cross-Lingual Inconsistencies in LLM Factual Error Rejection, by Sanghyeok Park and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.09349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern LLMs demonstrate impressive multilingual performance, yet standard benchmarks primarily reward selecting correct answers rat…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.