Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Success Leaves Detours: Learning Executable Walkthroughs for Long-Horizon Agents

Summary

arXiv:2609.22120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time self-evolving agents improve by reusing past experience, yet sparse-reward trajectories contain failures, loops, and detours, while summaries often omit the state conditions and action dependencies needed for execution. We study executable Walkthrough induction from sparse-reward trajectories: extracting compact, state-conditioned, and verifiable procedures. Our key observation is that delayed credit identifies actions associated with progress but cannot determine whether they produce facts required by later actions. We propose Trace, a credit-guided, dependency-grounded framework that compiles noisy trajectories into executable Walkthrough Memory. It detects progress anchors from rewards and persistent state changes, propagates cr…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Kaijie Chen, Chenyu Fang, Liang Yan, Bo Li, Bo Zhang, Peng Ye
Success Leaves Detours: Learning Executable Walkthroughs for Long-Horizon Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Aug 2026]

Title:Success Leaves Detours: Learning Executable Walkthroughs for Long-Horizon Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled Success Leaves Detours: Learning Executable Walkthroughs for Long-Horizon Agents, by Kaijie Chen and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Test-time self-evolving agents improve by reusing past experience, yet sparse-reward trajectories contain failures, loops, and detours, while summaries often omit the state conditions and action dependencies needed for execution. We study executable Walkthrough induction from sparse-reward trajectories: extracting compact, state-conditioned, and verifiable procedures. Our key observation is that delayed credit identifies actions associated with progress but cannot determine whether they produce facts required by later actions. We propose Trace, a credit-guided, dependency-grounded framework that compiles noisy trajectories into executable Walkthrough Memory. It detects progress anchors from rewards and persistent state changes, propagates credit to identify valuable transitions, and estimates action prerequisites from cross-episode success and failure evidence. Backward dependency slicing then traces required facts to their producers, extracting dependency-consistent action chains while removing irrelevant loops and detours. The resulting Walkthroughs encode entry conditions, ordered state--action--effect steps, and completion and failure predicates, supporting reuse, intermediate-state resumption, and programmatic verification. Experiments on J-TTL, WebShop, and ScienceWorld with three open-source LLMs show that Trace consistently outperforms eight test-time learning and memory baselines. Compared with the strongest baseline, it improves average AUC and Final-$3$ by $30.0%$ and $40.5%$, respectively, while using fewer inference tokens. These results show that long-horizon interaction benefits more from state-conditioned executable procedures than from complete trajectories or abstract summaries.

Comments: 13 pages

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.22120 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.22120v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22120

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kaijie Chen [view email] [v1] Thu, 20 Aug 2026 01:10:11 UTC (583 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Success Leaves Detours: Learning Executable Walkthroughs for Long-Horizon Agents, by Kaijie Chen and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.22120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time self-evolving agents improve by reusing past experience, yet sparse-reward trajectories contain failures, loops, and deto…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.