Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
In-site rewrite1 min read

Substack adds an AI detector to help spot blogs written by no one

Summary

Substack partners with AI detection company Pangram to offer a tool that scans posts, notes, replies, and comments for AI-generated text. Creators can also declare their writing process to enhance transparency. The tool is now available on web and iOS, with Android coming soon.

SourceThe Verge AIAuthor: Emma Roth
Substack adds an AI detector to help spot blogs written by no one
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

Substack will now help users determine whether what they’re reading may have been written by AI. A new tool coming to the platform can scan posts, notes, replies, and comments to provide an estimate of how much text could be AI-generated, according to a blog post published on Tuesday. The tool is powered by an AI detection company called Pangram and is rolling out across the web and the iOS app, with an Android launch coming “soon.” Readers can analyze content longer than 100 words by choosing the “Scan for AI text” option from the three-dot menu in the top-right corner of a post. Substack co-founder and CEO Chris Best says the Pangram integration is meant to increase transparency on the platform as AI becomes more prevalent on social media. “The core problem is not people using AI, or the quality of its output,” Best writes. “The problem is when there is a mismatch between a reader’s expectation and reality, especially when they unwittingly invest their attention in something with no human thought on the other end. That’s Claudefishing.” [Image: https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/07/substack-pangram.jpg?quality=90&strip=all] In line with this change, Substack will also allow creators to explain their writing process to readers with a new “How I make this” statement. Writers can scan their drafts with Pangram, too, and will have an option to report inaccurate results. Best notes that “Pangram can only detect whether AI was used to make the text, not whether great human care went into creating it, nor whether AI tools were used as a source.” But the goal, according to Best, is to make it easier for someone to choose to invest their time reading a blog post. “When readers have to wonder if what they’re reading is real, it undermines trust in authorship and threatens the livelihood of writers — including those who use AI tools thoughtfully to produce work they believe in,” Best writes. “Platforms that reward fakeness will create a race to the bottom.”

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Substack integrates Pangram's AI detection for content over 100 words across posts, notes, replies, and comments.
  • Readers use the 'Scan for AI text' option from the post menu to get an AI-generation estimate.
  • Creators can add a 'How I make this' statement and report inaccurate detections.
  • CEO Chris Best aims to combat 'Claudefishing' and preserve trust in authorship.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.