AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

StreamPro: From Reactive Perception to Proactive Decision-Making in Streaming Video

Proactive streaming video understanding requires models to decide when to respond under partial observations, not just what to respond. Existing benchmarks follow a 'see-then-answer' paradigm, failing to evaluate timely and reliable decision-making with incomplete information. This paper introduces StreamPro-Bench, which evaluates models from three perspectives: Perception Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Proactive Agency. It also proposes StreamPro, a two-stage training framework using CB-Stream Loss and GRPO with multi-grained rewards, achieving 41.5 on StreamPro-Bench (vs. previous best 10.4) and 78.9 on StreamingBench-RTVU.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Ao Li, Zihan Xiao, Zihao Yue, Boshen Xu, Linli Yao, Jiaze Li, Pei Fu, Jianzhong Ju, Jian Luan, Qin Jin

[2605.16381] StreamPro: From Reactive Perception to Proactive Decision-Making in Streaming Video

[Submitted on 11 May 2026]

Title:StreamPro: From Reactive Perception to Proactive Decision-Making in Streaming Video

View a PDF of the paper titled StreamPro: From Reactive Perception to Proactive Decision-Making in Streaming Video, by Ao Li and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Proactive streaming video understanding requires models to continuously process video streams and decide when to respond, rather than merely what to respond. This naturally introduces a decision-making problem under partial observations, where models must balance early prediction against sufficient evidence. However, existing benchmarks largely follow a "see-then-answer" paradigm, where responses are triggered only after explicit evidence appears, effectively reducing proactive reasoning to delayed perception. As a result, they fail to evaluate a model's ability to make timely and reliable decisions under incomplete observations. Moreover, training proactive models is inherently challenging due to the extreme imbalance between silence and response signals in streaming trajectories, as well as the need to jointly optimize response correctness and timing. To address these challenges, we introduce StreamPro-Bench, a new benchmark that evaluates streaming models from three complementary perspectives: Perception Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Proactive Agency, where the last measures a model's ability to make early yet reliable decisions under partial observations. We further propose StreamPro, a two-stage training framework for proactive learning. First, we introduce CB-Stream Loss to mitigate the severe supervision imbalance during supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Then, we apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a multi-grained reward design that involves both turn-level and trajectory-level rewards. Experiments show that StreamPro significantly improves proactive performance. On StreamPro-Bench, it achieves 41.5, substantially outperforming the previous best (10.4), while also maintaining strong performance on real-time streaming benchmarks, achieving 78.9 on StreamingBench-RTVU.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.16381 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.16381v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16381

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ao Li [view email] [v1] Mon, 11 May 2026 05:01:15 UTC (4,651 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled StreamPro: From Reactive Perception to Proactive Decision-Making in Streaming Video, by Ao Li and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)