[Submitted on 21 Jul 2026]
Title:Stop Removing Stopwords: How an Inherited Preprocessing Default Distorts Legal Text-as-Data
View a PDF of the paper titled Stop Removing Stopwords: How an Inherited Preprocessing Default Distorts Legal Text-as-Data, by Gregory M. Dickinson
View PDF
Abstract:Empirical legal scholarship increasingly treats judicial text as data, and much of it still runs on sparse, interpretable pipelines -- TF-IDF features and linear classifiers -- because the textual feature is often the object of study, not merely a means to a prediction. Yet these pipelines inherit a chain of preprocessing defaults from mid-century information retrieval that were never validated against classification accuracy, the most entrenched being stopword removal. This study introduces an exhaustive single-word ablation that measures a preprocessing step's effect directly against the downstream objective, and applies it to stopword removal as the hardest case to dislodge. Matching Supreme Court Database labels to Caselaw Access Project opinion texts, it examines two binary tasks that bracket F1 headroom, ideological direction (no-removal baseline F1 ~ 0.68) and constitutional versus non-constitutional law type (~ 0.92), across 7,668 and 7,001 opinions. For each task the analysis approximates the best stoplist any expert could build, removing each of roughly 18,500 candidate words and measuring the effect directly. Three findings follow: generic stoplists in common use fall below the no-removal baseline in every test; even optimized stoplists are statistically indistinguishable from removing nothing; and meta-models trained on word-level features cannot predict which removals help, so list curation has nothing to target. The method generalizes to any inherited preprocessing default, and the result is a caution specific to interpretable legal text-as-data: a step that silently reshapes which features a model sees can distort the very doctrinal and ideological signal such research exists to recover. Leaving stopwords in place is a question of measurement validity.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
MSC classes: 68T50 (Primary) 68P20, 62H30 (Secondary)
ACM classes: I.2.7; H.3.1; I.5.2; H.3.3; I.2.6; J.1
Cite as: arXiv:2609.19153 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.19153v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19153
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Gregory Dickinson [view email] [v1] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:55:19 UTC (599 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Stop Removing Stopwords: How an Inherited Preprocessing Default Distorts Legal Text-as-Data, by Gregory M. Dickinson
View PDF
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs cs.CY cs.IR cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)