Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory

Summary

This research introduces state commitment learning, using Counterfactual Erasure RL (CERL) to train language models to distinguish temporary computation from persistent state, reducing answer dependence on hidden thoughts without sacrificing accuracy.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Fei Ding, Yongkang Zhang, Runhao Liu, Yuhao Liao, Zijian Zeng, Huiming Yang
State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.05201] State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory

[Submitted on 22 May 2026]

Title:State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory

View a PDF of the paper titled State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory, by Fei Ding and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Reasoning language models do not distinguish tokens used for computation from tokens that constitute persistent state: once generated, all hidden thoughts remain in context and influence future predictions. As a result, downstream reasoning may depend on failed attempts, dead ends, and private scratch work that should not be safely relied on later. We recast this phenomenon as a new training objective, state commitment learning: training models to explicitly distinguish information that should be committed as persistent state from temporary computation that can be discarded. We define a counterfactual criterion, persistent-state sufficiency, which makes it trainable and measurable whether an answer remains usable after hidden thoughts are erased. We then propose Counterfactual Erasure RL (CERL), which evaluates, under the same prefix, both a path that keeps hidden thoughts and a path that erases them, and gives reward only when the erasure path remains correct. We also introduce the Erasure Dependence Protocol and show across mathematics, long-chain logic, scientific QA, and multi-turn tool-use evaluation that CERL substantially reduces answer dependence on hidden thoughts without sacrificing accuracy, consistently outperforming correctness-only RL and long-answer SFT baselines.

Comments: 17 pages

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.05201 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.05201v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05201

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zijian Zeng [view email] [v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 17:05:31 UTC (29 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory, by Fei Ding and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Reasoning LMs keep all hidden thoughts in context, causing reliance on failed attempts and dead ends.
  • State commitment learning trains models to distinguish persistent state from discardable computation.
  • Counterfactual Erasure RL (CERL) rewards only when erasing hidden thoughts remains correct.
  • Experiments show reduced dependence without accuracy loss across math, logic, science QA, and tool use.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

State commitment learning: training language models to distinguish computation from memory | AI News Hub