Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Should SLMs be in the Driver's Seat? A Study of Local Models as Interpreters in Cloud-Written Agent Programs

Summary

arXiv:2610.14209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The most accurate agents executing user-provided tasks are driven by large, cloud-hosted models, which solve them by reading the private data of the user. Agents powered by models small enough to run on edge devices keep that data local, but yield far worse results. A third option is to have cloud models write a program that devices execute: the data stays local, but as the program is written before any data is seen, it fails whenever a step depends on interpreting content that appears only at run time. We explore an intermediate architecture, in which the cloud-written program defers bounded questions over user data to a small local model through an ordinary function call. On AppWorld this improves the success rate of a code-only agent in a…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Boris Radovi\v{c}, Marco Canini, Veljko Pejovi\'c
Should SLMs be in the Driver's Seat? A Study of Local Models as Interpreters in Cloud-Written Agent Programs
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Oct 2026]

Title:Should SLMs be in the Driver's Seat? A Study of Local Models as Interpreters in Cloud-Written Agent Programs

View a PDF of the paper titled Should SLMs be in the Driver's Seat? A Study of Local Models as Interpreters in Cloud-Written Agent Programs, by Boris Radovi\v{c} and Marco Canini and Veljko Pejovi\'c

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The most accurate agents executing user-provided tasks are driven by large, cloud-hosted models, which solve them by reading the private data of the user. Agents powered by models small enough to run on edge devices keep that data local, but yield far worse results. A third option is to have cloud models write a program that devices execute: the data stays local, but as the program is written before any data is seen, it fails whenever a step depends on interpreting content that appears only at run time. We explore an intermediate architecture, in which the cloud-written program defers bounded questions over user data to a small local model through an ordinary function call. On AppWorld this improves the success rate of a code-only agent in all six combinations of backbone model and test partition we evaluate, by up to 14.9pp, recovering a substantial part of the gap to a cloud-hosted ReAct loop while keeping user data on the device.

Comments: Accepted at SLM-Agents: 1st Workshop on SLMs for Agentic Systems, NeurIPS 2026

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.14209 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.14209v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14209

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Boris Radovič [view email] [v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 18:20:39 UTC (127 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Should SLMs be in the Driver's Seat? A Study of Local Models as Interpreters in Cloud-Written Agent Programs, by Boris Radovi\v{c} and Marco Canini and Veljko Pejovi\'c

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.DC

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.14209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The most accurate agents executing user-provided tasks are driven by large, cloud-hosted models, which solve them by reading the pr…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.