Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs

Summary

A study reveals that large language models often idealize disability experiences, presenting overly positive stereotypes that fail to capture real struggles, and also exhibit bias by associating certain topics disproportionately with non-disabled individuals.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Marco Bombieri, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Marco Rospocher
Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.20191] Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs

[Submitted on 2 Apr 2026]

Title:Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs, by Marco Bombieri and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently attracted much attention for their ability to simulate human behavior and generate text that reflects personas and demographic groups. While these capabilities can open up a multitude of diverse applications across fields, it is crucial to examine how such models represent various target groups since LLMs can perpetuate and amplify biases or discrimination against historically marginalized communities or, alternatively, as a result of debiasing efforts, overcorrect by portraying overly positive stereotypes. This overcompensation can idealize these groups, erasing the complexities and challenges they face in favor of unrealistic depictions. In this paper, we investigate how LLMs represent disability by simulating the perspectives of individuals with disabilities in generating social media posts. These posts are then compared with those written by real people with disabilities, focusing on emotional tone, sentiment, and representative words and themes. Our analysis reveals two key findings: (1) LLMs often idealize the experiences of people with disabilities, producing overly positive stereotypes that, despite appearing uplifting, fail to authentically capture their lived realities; and (2) a comparative analysis of posts simulating individuals with and without disabilities highlights a negative bias, where certain topics, such as career and entertainment, are disproportionately associated with nondisabled individuals. This reinforces exclusionary narratives and over-idealized portrayals of disability, misrepresenting the actual challenges faced by this community. These findings align with broader concerns and ongoing research showing that LLMs struggle to reflect the diverse realities of society, particularly the nuanced experiences of marginalized groups, and underscore the need for critical scrutiny of their representations.

Comments: Accepted for publication in ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.20191 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.20191v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20191

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Journal reference: ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (2026)

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3806202

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Marco Bombieri [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Apr 2026 08:39:42 UTC (2,051 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs, by Marco Bombieri and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • LLMs generate overly positive stereotypes about disability, erasing real challenges.
  • LLMs show negative bias by linking career and entertainment topics more to non-disabled people.
  • The findings highlight the need for critical scrutiny of how LLMs represent marginalized groups.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.