Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Shedding Light: A Benchmark for Evaluating Lighting Understanding in Generative Image Models

Summary

arXiv:2609.10787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate modelling of illumination is central to realistic image synthesis and scene understanding. Yet, there is little exploration into whether image generative models are good at this task or whether physical plausibility remains a key challenge for them. Clearly, significant progress has been made in realistic image synthesis, but do models truly understand lighting in a physically accurate manner? To answer this question, this work proposes a benchmark to assess the lighting understanding and harmonisation capabilities of generative models. Our key insight is that evaluating lighting understanding for such models only requires testing how well they insert novel objects into real photographs whilst maintaining consistent illumination. To…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Justine Giroux, Jack Oliver Hilliard, Yannick Hold-Geoffroy, Javier Vazquez-Corral, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Lalonde
Shedding Light: A Benchmark for Evaluating Lighting Understanding in Generative Image Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Sep 2026]

Title:Shedding Light: A Benchmark for Evaluating Lighting Understanding in Generative Image Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Shedding Light: A Benchmark for Evaluating Lighting Understanding in Generative Image Models, by Justine Giroux and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Accurate modelling of illumination is central to realistic image synthesis and scene understanding. Yet, there is little exploration into whether image generative models are good at this task or whether physical plausibility remains a key challenge for them. Clearly, significant progress has been made in realistic image synthesis, but do models truly understand lighting in a physically accurate manner? To answer this question, this work proposes a benchmark to assess the lighting understanding and harmonisation capabilities of generative models. Our key insight is that evaluating lighting understanding for such models only requires testing how well they insert novel objects into real photographs whilst maintaining consistent illumination. To do so, we use a multi-illumination dataset with images containing simple objects serving as ``light probes'', and prompt models to inpaint the same object onto the original image, then compare the generated results against the ground-truth light probes. We then estimate the lighting direction, colour and radiance distribution from the inpainted probes, providing a quantitative measure of illumination accuracy and photometric realism. Our work establishes a scalable evaluation protocol to systematically assess how well generative models capture and reproduce real-world lighting, offering a foundation for benchmarking the photometric accuracy of any future models. All code and data are available at this https URL .

Comments: Accepted to ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia 2026), vol. 45, no. 6, article 227, December 2026. 25 pages. Project page: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

ACM classes: I.2.10; I.4.8; I.3.7; I.3.3

Cite as: arXiv:2609.10787 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.10787v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10787

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3842579

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Justine Giroux [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 19:49:30 UTC (42,675 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Shedding Light: A Benchmark for Evaluating Lighting Understanding in Generative Image Models, by Justine Giroux and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.10787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate modelling of illumination is central to realistic image synthesis and scene understanding. Yet, there is little exploratio…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.