Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

SemiScope: Disentangling Classifier Tuning and Joint Optimization in Semi-Supervised Security Classification

Summary

This study disentangles the effects of classifier tuning vs. joint optimization in semi-supervised learning (SSL) pipelines for security classification, finding that simply tuning the classifier with Bayesian Optimization recovers 86% of the performance gain, and a simplified recipe matches the full pipeline.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Rui Shu, Tianpei Xia, Jingzhu He
SemiScope: Disentangling Classifier Tuning and Joint Optimization in Semi-Supervised Security Classification
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Jun 2026]

Title:SemiScope: Disentangling Classifier Tuning and Joint Optimization in Semi-Supervised Security Classification

View a PDF of the paper titled SemiScope: Disentangling Classifier Tuning and Joint Optimization in Semi-Supervised Security Classification, by Rui Shu and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Background. Labeled data for security classification is scarce. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) propagates labels from a small labeled pool to larger unlabeled pools. Yet security applications often use SSL as a black box: default parameters, a fixed classifier, and no handling of pseudo-label-induced class imbalance. Aims. Recent work reports sizeable gains from optimizing SSL pipelines via joint search, AutoML, or per-component tuning. These gains are hard to attribute: they may reflect useful SSL-classifier interactions, or mostly from simply tuning the downstream classifier. We disentangle these effects for binary tabular security data with classical SSL and tree-based classifiers. Method. We build SemiScope as an analysis instrument, not a deployment recommendation. It uses Bayesian Optimization to jointly tune SSL settings, confidence filtering, oversampling, and the classifier. The key control, Tuned-Clf, fixes SSL to defaults but gets the same 100-trial classifier budget and validation-set threshold tuning as SemiScope. At 10% labels, we compare them with paired TOST using a +/-1.0 g-measure smallest effect of interest. Results. SemiScope beats every default SSL baseline on all five datasets, improving over the strongest by 0.7-12.7 points. Under the equal-budget control, Tuned-Clf is statistically equivalent to the full pipeline on 4 of 5 datasets; Phishing is inconclusive. Classifier HPO alone recovers a median 86% of SemiScope's gain over Default Self-Training (ST) + Random Forest (RF). Conclusions. The reusable contribution is the decomposition protocol. A simpler recipe suffices: use Self-Training, tune the classifier with Bayesian Optimization, and tune the decision threshold on validation data. It reaches within 1 g-measure of Supervised RF at 20-30% labels on four datasets and 40% on Drebin, at the same or lower label rate than Default ST + RF on every dataset.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.00113 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.00113v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.00113

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Rui Shu [view email] [v1] Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:50:18 UTC (2,424 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SemiScope: Disentangling Classifier Tuning and Joint Optimization in Semi-Supervised Security Classification, by Rui Shu and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • SemiScope uses Bayesian Optimization to jointly tune SSL components and classifier, but a controlled comparison shows that tuning only the classifier achieves similar results.
  • On five security datasets, classifier-only tuning recovers a median 86% of the full pipeline's gain over default SSL, and is statistically equivalent on four of five datasets.
  • A simpler recipe is recommended: use Self-Training, tune the classifier with Bayesian Optimization, and tune the decision threshold on validation data.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.