Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Scaling Therapy Supervision: Assessing Psychotherapy Fidelity Using Large Language Models

Summary

arXiv:2610.28772v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Psychotherapy fidelity assessment measures how faithfully a therapist adheres to a treatment protocol, a critical determinant of positive patient outcomes. However, fidelity assessment is bottlenecked by manual expert review, rendering the process labor-intensive and unscalable. To scale therapy supervision and support clinician self-learning, we present an integrated application of large language models (LLMs) that automates psychotherapy fidelity workflows and generates actionable supervisory feedback from authentic, long-form clinical transcripts. We evaluate three open-weight models across multiple task decomposition configurations and reasoning strategies, demonstrating that evidence-first reasoning improves fidelity estimation. Further…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Arvind Pillai, Alexis Roach, Jason Holden, Varsha D Badal, Subigya Nepal, Yu Yvonne Wu, Yuliang Chen, Sudarshan Regmi, Sarah Masud Preum, Nicholas C Jacobson, Nikhil Singh, Eric Granholm, Colin Depp, Andrew Campbell
Scaling Therapy Supervision: Assessing Psychotherapy Fidelity Using Large Language Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Oct 2026]

Title:Scaling Therapy Supervision: Assessing Psychotherapy Fidelity Using Large Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Scaling Therapy Supervision: Assessing Psychotherapy Fidelity Using Large Language Models, by Arvind Pillai and 13 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Psychotherapy fidelity assessment measures how faithfully a therapist adheres to a treatment protocol, a critical determinant of positive patient outcomes. However, fidelity assessment is bottlenecked by manual expert review, rendering the process labor-intensive and unscalable. To scale therapy supervision and support clinician self-learning, we present an integrated application of large language models (LLMs) that automates psychotherapy fidelity workflows and generates actionable supervisory feedback from authentic, long-form clinical transcripts. We evaluate three open-weight models across multiple task decomposition configurations and reasoning strategies, demonstrating that evidence-first reasoning improves fidelity estimation. Furthermore, we establish the framework's external construct validity on an independent randomized controlled trial (RCT), where it reliably distinguishes Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) from non-CBT sessions across core therapeutic skills. Through a user study that evaluates the generated feedback, mental health experts indicate that the pipeline synthesizes actionable clinical feedback. Ultimately, our work offers a practical, scalable solution toward bridging the community mental health supervision gap.

Comments: 24 pages, under review

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.28772 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.28772v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.28772

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Arvind Pillai [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:09:44 UTC (244 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Scaling Therapy Supervision: Assessing Psychotherapy Fidelity Using Large Language Models, by Arvind Pillai and 13 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.HC

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.28772v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Psychotherapy fidelity assessment measures how faithfully a therapist adheres to a treatment protocol, a critical determinant of po…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.