Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations

Summary

arXiv:2609.19150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) encode rich stylistic structure in their hidden activations, but discovering which stylistic dimensions are salient for a given prompt typically requires supervised contrastive data. We present a training-free, prompt-conditional alternative: we repeatedly sample completions of a single prompt at elevated temperature, apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the pooled hidden activations, and label the resulting axes automatically from the pole generations. We validate the discovered axes against 245 human-elicited stylistic annotations in a two-phase study. On our strongest model (Qwen-3.5-4B-Instruct), the top two axes match spontaneously requested human dimensions with 72.8% precision and 43.6% macro-recall…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Ajit Mallavarapu, Ziwei Gu
Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Jul 2026]

Title:Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations

View a PDF of the paper titled Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations, by Ajit Mallavarapu and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) encode rich stylistic structure in their hidden activations, but discovering which stylistic dimensions are salient for a given prompt typically requires supervised contrastive data. We present a training-free, prompt-conditional alternative: we repeatedly sample completions of a single prompt at elevated temperature, apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the pooled hidden activations, and label the resulting axes automatically from the pole generations. We validate the discovered axes against 245 human-elicited stylistic annotations in a two-phase study. On our strongest model (Qwen-3.5-4B-Instruct), the top two axes match spontaneously requested human dimensions with 72.8% precision and 43.6% macro-recall, and 75.6% of validity ratings judge the axes' polar generations accurate to their labels, with 90.9% adjacent inter-annotator agreement. Discoverability is strongly model-dependent: both Qwen models and Llama-3.2-3B expose human-salient axes, while DeepSeek-7B-Chat drops to 35.3% precision, its leading components dominated by structural rather than stylistic variance. Simple PCA over a model's own decoding variance is thus an effective, low-cost probe of stylistic structure in LLM representations, one that also exposes sharp cross-model differences in how that structure is organized.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.19150 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.19150v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19150

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ajit Mallavarapu [view email] [v1] Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:55:26 UTC (480 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations, by Ajit Mallavarapu and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.19150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) encode rich stylistic structure in their hidden activations, but discovering which stylistic dimension…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.