2026-05-14 23:36 UTCIn-site rewrite2 min readUpdated: 2026-06-30 13:03 UTC

Sam Altman Is Taking a Lot of Punches on the Witness Stand

In the high-profile trial between Elon Musk and OpenAI, Sam Altman's credibility is under attack as Musk's lawyers question his trustworthiness and work relationships. The case may not hinge on facts but on public perception of Altman.

SourceHacker News AIAuthor: cdrnsf

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on Bluesky

Comments

Musk's wins so far mainly involve making OpenAI and Altman look ridiculous.Mother Jones illustration; Andrew Harnik/Getty; Anna Moneymaker/Getty

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

Can you trust Sam Altman?

That was one of the central themes at the high-profile trial between the OpenAI CEO and Elon Musk in California this week, as Musk’s lawyers peppered Altman with questions on his work relationships, including his temporary ouster from OpenAI three years ago by a mistrustful board of directors. Steven Molo, Musk’s top litigator, referred to testimony from executives like former OpenAI chief technology officer Mira Murati, who said Altman had a habit of “creating chaos” by “saying one thing to one person and completely the opposite to another person.”

Molo also cited an April New Yorker investigation in which a wide array of sources close to Altman described him as someone with an unrelenting drive for power.

Distraught text messages from Altman to Murati pleading for his job in 2023 raised parallels with how Altman’s team framed Musk’s explosive exit from OpenAI in 2018, after the Tesla head lost a reported power struggle for control of the company. Altman’s lawyers framed Musk’s 2024 suit againstOpenAI and its leadership as simple retaliation, unmotivated by any actual concern about OpenAI’s original, feel-good nonprofit mission to advance AI in a manner “to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.”

Musk’s argument is that OpenAI abandoned its values for profits and should therefore return $150 billion to its nonprofit arm—but for Musk, the trial doesn’t particularly seem to revolve around the facts of the case.

The wins, such as they are, come in the form of peeling back the tireless hours of public relations strategizing and mythologizing to make OpenAI and Altman look ridiculous. Musk’s lawyers’ examination of Altman seems intended to extract as many unconvincing responses of “I don’t recall” and “I can’t say how other people think” as possible. (Honestly, just getting these guys to talk in environments they don’t have full control over does most of the job.) Molo’s questioning often devolved into pettiness:

Molo: “Are you completely trustworthy?”

Altman: “I believe so.”

Molo: “You don’t know whether you’re completely trustworthy?”

Altman: “I’ll just amend my answer to yes.”

The public doesn’t need to think Musk is right; they only need to think Altman lies a lot.

A lot of the work has already been done for Musk. According to a national NBC News survey from March, 57 percent of registered voters said the risks of AI outweigh its benefits. Sam Altman is one of the most prominent faces of the industry, and there were two separate attacks on Altman’s home in the span of three days last month.

So as closing arguments wrap up and jury deliberations begin next week, the result of the lawsuit may not even matter. The damage is already underway.

We Recommend

Trump Officials, Billionaires and the Quiet Reshaping of America’s Public Lands

Ames Alexander and Evan Simon

How to Steal Back the Future: Boots Riley on His “Best Film Yet”

Chasity Hale

How Crypto Billionaires Are Trying to Buy a Senate Seat in Alabama

Noah Lanard