AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Safe Domain Adaptation for Physics: Overcoming Nuisances, Label Shifts, and Simulation Priors

arXiv:2608.18190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Domain adaptation is widely used to make neural networks trained on simulations applicable to experimental data. Its premise is that the two domains differ only in nuisances, and that the quantity of interest is distributed identically in both. In physics neither assumption holds: simulations can be wrong about the physics, and the distribution of the target quantity - an energy spectrum, a redshift distribution - is often the measurement itself. We study the consequences of such mismatches on a toy air-shower benchmark in which a detector-response nuisance, a physical simulation shift, and an energy-spectrum shift can be switched on separately or together. Standard adversarial adaptation handles the conditional shifts, but once the two spectra differ it aligns them, replacing an uncontrolled bias by one anchored on the simulation prior. We present adaptive domain adaptation, which reweights the simulated events so as to focus domain adaptation on the genuine physical mismatch alone. Since the predicted spectrum depends on model training configuration, we provide a label-free model selection rule for selecting the near-the-best operation point.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Ivan Kharuk (Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology)

-->

[Submitted on 18 Aug 2026]

Title:Safe Domain Adaptation for Physics: Overcoming Nuisances, Label Shifts, and Simulation Priors

View a PDF of the paper titled Safe Domain Adaptation for Physics: Overcoming Nuisances, Label Shifts, and Simulation Priors, by Ivan Kharuk (1 and 2) ((1) Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Domain adaptation is widely used to make neural networks trained on simulations applicable to experimental data. Its premise is that the two domains differ only in nuisances, and that the quantity of interest is distributed identically in both. In physics neither assumption holds: simulations can be wrong about the physics, and the distribution of the target quantity - an energy spectrum, a redshift distribution - is often the measurement itself. We study the consequences of such mismatches on a toy air-shower benchmark in which a detector-response nuisance, a physical simulation shift, and an energy-spectrum shift can be switched on separately or together. Standard adversarial adaptation handles the conditional shifts, but once the two spectra differ it aligns them, replacing an uncontrolled bias by one anchored on the simulation prior. We present adaptive domain adaptation, which reweights the simulated events so as to focus domain adaptation on the genuine physical mismatch alone. Since the predicted spectrum depends on model training configuration, we provide a label-free model selection rule for selecting the near-the-best operation point.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.18190 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.18190v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18190

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ivan Kharuk [view email] [v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:51:59 UTC (1,347 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Safe Domain Adaptation for Physics: Overcoming Nuisances, Label Shifts, and Simulation Priors, by Ivan Kharuk (1 and 2) ((1) Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

astro-ph astro-ph.IM cs physics physics.data-an

References & Citations

INSPIRE HEP

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)