Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search

Summary

arXiv:2609.12261v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-object tracking (MOT) is dominated by the tracking-by-detection paradigm, whose methods typically rely on a small set of hyperparameters that are conventionally chosen by hand. Tuning them requires repeated expert-guided experimentation, while the procedures used to select reported values are often not systematically evaluated or fully documented. Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) automates this process, yet it remains rarely used in MOT, and existing studies applying HPO to MOT predate modern deep-detector-based trackers and HOTA evaluation. We systematically apply HPO across two datasets and four tracking-by-detection methods. We also propose Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search (MFGCS), which optimizes one hyperparameter at a tim…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Momir Ad\v{z}emovi\'c
Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 10 Sep 2026]

Title:Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search

View a PDF of the paper titled Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search, by Momir Ad\v{z}emovi\'c

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multi-object tracking (MOT) is dominated by the tracking-by-detection paradigm, whose methods typically rely on a small set of hyperparameters that are conventionally chosen by hand. Tuning them requires repeated expert-guided experimentation, while the procedures used to select reported values are often not systematically evaluated or fully documented. Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) automates this process, yet it remains rarely used in MOT, and existing studies applying HPO to MOT predate modern deep-detector-based trackers and HOTA evaluation. We systematically apply HPO across two datasets and four tracking-by-detection methods. We also propose Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search (MFGCS), which optimizes one hyperparameter at a time by first evaluating candidate values on a small subset of scenes and re-evaluating only promising candidates on the full dataset. Across all eight tracker-dataset combinations, the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) and MFGCS outperform both our hand-tuned configurations and the corresponding published results, with improvements of up to 4.38 and 16.05 HOTA points, respectively. MFGCS also reaches a predefined HOTA target faster than TPE in seven of the eight combinations. Within each tracker-dataset pair, all optimizers share the same search space and evaluation pipeline, isolating the effect of the search strategy. We release the code and tuned configurations to enable future work to compare against systematically optimized rather than default or manually tuned baselines.

Comments: 23 pages, 7 figures, 12 tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

MSC classes: 68T45, 90C56, 68T05

ACM classes: I.4.8; I.2.10; G.1.6

Cite as: arXiv:2609.12261 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.12261v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12261

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Momir Adžemović [view email] [v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 22:36:08 UTC (100 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search, by Momir Ad\v{z}emovi\'c

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.12261v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-object tracking (MOT) is dominated by the tracking-by-detection paradigm, whose methods typically rely on a small set of hype…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.