Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

ReVision: Scaling Computer-Use Agents via Temporal Visual Redundancy Reduction

Summary

ReVision trains multimodal language models to remove redundant visual patches between consecutive screenshots, reducing token usage by ~46% on average while improving success rate by 3%. This efficiency gain enables agents to process longer trajectories with fewer tokens, and reveals that performance saturation in visual history is due to inefficient token representation.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Amirhossein Abaskohi, Yuhang He, Peter West, Giuseppe Carenini, Pranit Chawla, Vibhav Vineet
ReVision: Scaling Computer-Use Agents via Temporal Visual Redundancy Reduction
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.11212] ReVision: Scaling Computer-Use Agents via Temporal Visual Redundancy Reduction

[Submitted on 11 May 2026]

Title:ReVision: Scaling Computer-Use Agents via Temporal Visual Redundancy Reduction

View a PDF of the paper titled ReVision: Scaling Computer-Use Agents via Temporal Visual Redundancy Reduction, by Amirhossein Abaskohi and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Computer-use agents~(CUAs) rely on visual observations of graphical user interfaces, where each screenshot is encoded into a large number of visual tokens. As interaction trajectories grow, the token cost increases rapidly, limiting the amount of history that can be incorporated under fixed context and compute budgets. This has resulted in no or very limited improvement in the performance when using history unlike other domains. We address this inefficiency by introducing ReVision, which is used to train multimodal language models on trajectories where redundant visual patches are removed using a learned patch selector that compares patch representations across consecutive screenshots while preserving spatial structure required by the model. Across three benchmarks, OSWorld, WebTailBench, and AgentNetBench, when processing trajectories with 5 history screenshots using Qwen2.5-VL-7B, ReVision reduces token usage by approximately 46% on average while improving success rate by 3% over the no drop baseline. This establishes a clear efficiency gain, enabling agents to process longer trajectories with fewer tokens. With this improved efficiency, we revisit the role of history in CUAs and find that performance continues to improve as more past observations are incorporated when redundancy is removed. This suggests that the commonly observed saturation in visual history is not due to limited usefulness of past information, but rather a consequence of inefficient token representations.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.11212 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.11212v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.11212

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Amirhossein Abaskohi [view email] [v1] Mon, 11 May 2026 20:27:54 UTC (6,757 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ReVision: Scaling Computer-Use Agents via Temporal Visual Redundancy Reduction, by Amirhossein Abaskohi and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • ReVision uses a learned patch selector to compare patch representations across consecutive screenshots and remove redundant patches.
  • On three benchmarks (OSWorld, WebTailBench, AgentNetBench), it reduces token usage by ~46% and improves success rate by 3% using Qwen2.5-VL-7B.
  • With redundancy removed, performance continues to improve with more history, challenging the notion of saturation.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.