Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Representation and Reference Selection in Training-Free Synthetic Image Attribution

Summary

A new study investigates the interplay between representation space and reference selection in training-free reference-based synthetic image attribution. Using representations from different layers of CLIP and DINOv2 along with three reference selection methods, the authors show that attribution accuracy peaks at intermediate layers and that semantically constrained references reduce query-reference mismatch, improving performance especially under limited reference budgets.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Meiling Li, Pietro Bongini, Benedetta Tondi, Mauro Barni
Representation and Reference Selection in Training-Free Synthetic Image Attribution
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 13 Jul 2026]

Title:Representation and Reference Selection in Training-Free Synthetic Image Attribution

View a PDF of the paper titled Representation and Reference Selection in Training-Free Synthetic Image Attribution, by Meiling Li and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Synthetic image attribution aims at identifying the generator responsible for a given AI-generated image. Training-free reference-based attribution methods are easily scalable, since newly emerging generators can be incorporated by adding source-specific references rather than retraining a task-specific classifier. Their performance depends on two coupled factors: the representation space used for comparison and the way source-specific references are constructed. However, the interaction between these two factors remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we provide a controlled analysis of this interaction using references and off-the-shelf pretrained representations. We study representations extracted from different layers of CLIP and DINOv2, along with three reference selection methods with varying semantic constraints: arbitrary, semantically aligned, and resynthesis-based references. Our results show that attribution accuracy consistently peaks at intermediate representation levels, indicating that source-discriminative cues are more accessible before strong semantic abstraction dominates. We further show that intermediate representations are not completely semantically neutral, making reference selection critical: semantically constrained references reduce query-reference mismatch and improve attribution, especially under limited reference budgets. Resynthesis is most useful in low-reference regimes, while semantically aligned references provide a better accuracy-cost trade-off when a moderate-sized reference pool is available. Our findings show that training-free reference-based attribution should be understood as the interaction between where images are compared, how the reference set is constructed, and how many references are available.

Comments: 6 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.12052 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2607.12052v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.12052

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Meiling Li [view email] [v1] Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:10:39 UTC (1,130 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Representation and Reference Selection in Training-Free Synthetic Image Attribution, by Meiling Li and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CR

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • Attribution accuracy peaks at intermediate representation levels, indicating source-discriminative cues are more accessible before strong semantic abstraction.
  • Semantically constrained references (semantically aligned and resynthesis-based) reduce query-reference mismatch and improve attribution, especially with limited reference budgets.
  • Resynthesis is most useful in low-reference regimes, while semantically aligned references offer a better accuracy-cost trade-off with moderate reference pools.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.