AI News HubLIVE
原文2 min read

ReportQA: QA-Based Radiology Report Evaluation

ReportQA is a clinical and flexible radiology report evaluation framework using QA pairs and LLM-as-judge to compute QAScore, addressing limitations of existing NLG and CE metrics. Experiments show QAScore aligns better with radiologist judgments, and question-driven inference outperforms report-based paradigms.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Yiming Shi, Shaoshuai Yang, Xi Chen, Haolin Li, Hengyu Zhang, Che Jiang, Kaiwen Wang, Xun Zhu, Dong Xie, Fei Wang, Dejing Dou, Miao Li, Ji Wu

[2606.15037] ReportQA: QA-Based Radiology Report Evaluation

[Submitted on 13 Jun 2026]

Title:ReportQA: QA-Based Radiology Report Evaluation

View a PDF of the paper titled ReportQA: QA-Based Radiology Report Evaluation, by Yiming Shi and 12 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Radiology report evaluation is essential for advancing automated report generation. Natural language generation metrics have limited clinical relevance. Clinical efficacy (CE) metrics evaluate important medical findings, but focus mainly on presence and cover only a limited set of entities. Due to heavy reliance on manual annotations, it is difficult for CE metrics to extend clinical entities or attributes. In clinical practice, radiology reports serve as a medium for information transfer. Clinicians use them to perform downstream diagnostic tasks without directly inspecting images. Based on this insight, we propose ReportQA, a clinical-related and flexible radiology report evaluation framework, supporting detailed quantitative analysis of radiology report generation systems. We first collect datasets covering multiple imaging modalities and anatomical regions. We then construct knowledge trees of clinical entities and attributes with radiologist guidance, and use large language models (LLMs) to extract structured information from raw reports. Next, we generate QA pairs from predefined templates and apply quality control through self-filtering and report-based filtering. During evaluation, the report is treated as context, and an LLM acts as a judge model to answer the QA pairs. Based on the resulting QA accuracy, we introduce QAScore metric. Compared with existing metrics, QAScore shows better alignment with radiologist judgments. Experiments on multiple state-of-the-art vision-language models reveal that current report-based inference paradigms struggle to learn fine-grained clinical representations and exhibit strong negative prior biases. In contrast, question-driven inference provides a more effective alternative. For reproducibility and extensibility, we release the knowledge trees, structured reports, and QA pairs, along with the pipeline code for QA construction and evaluation.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.15037 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.15037v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15037

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yiming Shi [view email] [v1] Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:43:03 UTC (3,730 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ReportQA: QA-Based Radiology Report Evaluation, by Yiming Shi and 12 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)