AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Reconfiguration-Complete Motion Primitives with Constructive Planning for Deformable Planar Modular Robots

arXiv:2608.17324v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The continuously deformable geometry of modular robots makes it difficult to define a fixed representation for reconfiguration planning and analysis. This letter introduces a square-cell abstraction that maps deformable rhombus modules to fixed-size grid cells while retaining physically interpretable local motions through two primitives, pivoting and shearing. Under this abstraction, we prove that every non-straight edge-connected configuration with $N \geq 7$ can be transformed to a fixed canonical staircase using only admissible primitive motions. Since these motions are reversible, any two configurations in this class are mutually reconfigurable. The proof is constructive and directly yields a staircase-canonicalization planner that transports removable boundary modules while preserving connectivity. As a practical enhancement, we further introduce a boundary-to-delivery lookahead selector that ranks admissible high level choices without affecting the completeness guarantee. Experiments demonstrate the constructive reconfiguration process and show that the selector substantially reduces planning time, while reference comparisons indicate lower planning times than the prior framework over the shared module counts.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Jie Gu, Tingting Wang, Hongrun Gao, Yirun Sun, Zhihao Xia, Chunxu Tian, Dan Zhang

-->

[Submitted on 18 Aug 2026]

Title:Reconfiguration-Complete Motion Primitives with Constructive Planning for Deformable Planar Modular Robots

View a PDF of the paper titled Reconfiguration-Complete Motion Primitives with Constructive Planning for Deformable Planar Modular Robots, by Jie Gu and 6 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The continuously deformable geometry of modular robots makes it difficult to define a fixed representation for reconfiguration planning and analysis. This letter introduces a square-cell abstraction that maps deformable rhombus modules to fixed-size grid cells while retaining physically interpretable local motions through two primitives, pivoting and shearing. Under this abstraction, we prove that every non-straight edge-connected configuration with $N \geq 7$ can be transformed to a fixed canonical staircase using only admissible primitive motions. Since these motions are reversible, any two configurations in this class are mutually reconfigurable. The proof is constructive and directly yields a staircase-canonicalization planner that transports removable boundary modules while preserving connectivity. As a practical enhancement, we further introduce a boundary-to-delivery lookahead selector that ranks admissible high level choices without affecting the completeness guarantee. Experiments demonstrate the constructive reconfiguration process and show that the selector substantially reduces planning time, while reference comparisons indicate lower planning times than the prior framework over the shared module counts.

Comments: Jie Gu and Tingting Wang contributed equally to this work

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.17324 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2608.17324v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17324

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Gu Jie [view email] [v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 03:34:54 UTC (1,651 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Reconfiguration-Complete Motion Primitives with Constructive Planning for Deformable Planar Modular Robots, by Jie Gu and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)