Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Recognized but Not Produced: A Generation Benchmark for Culturally Specific Kinship Terms

Summary

arXiv:2609.26942v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current literature evaluates large language models (LLMs) on multilingual kinship understanding using multiple choice benchmarks, treating it as a recognition problem. We instead prompt five open weight LLMs to generate kinship terms in three non Western languages (Hindi, Tamil, and Korean) across two communicative tasks and pair this with a matched option-supported selection baseline. On identical relation language cells, GPT OSS120B selects the correct term in 90.67% of 75 valid cells but produces an accepted term in 36.00% of the corresponding attempts; Llama 3.370B shows the same pattern (77.92% versus 24.24%). Since the four-option condition displays the candidate terms and does not require script production, the difference is interpret…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Sahil Pardasani, Madhusudan Singh
Recognized but Not Produced: A Generation Benchmark for Culturally Specific Kinship Terms
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]

Title:Recognized but Not Produced: A Generation Benchmark for Culturally Specific Kinship Terms

View a PDF of the paper titled Recognized but Not Produced: A Generation Benchmark for Culturally Specific Kinship Terms, by Sahil Pardasani and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Current literature evaluates large language models (LLMs) on multilingual kinship understanding using multiple choice benchmarks, treating it as a recognition problem. We instead prompt five open weight LLMs to generate kinship terms in three non Western languages (Hindi, Tamil, and Korean) across two communicative tasks and pair this with a matched option-supported selection baseline. On identical relation language cells, GPT OSS120B selects the correct term in 90.67% of 75 valid cells but produces an accepted term in 36.00% of the corresponding attempts; Llama 3.370B shows the same pattern (77.92% versus 24.24%). Since the four-option condition displays the candidate terms and does not require script production, the difference is interpreted as an evaluation format gap rather than direct proof that lexical knowledge is intact. On explicitly specified L3 prompts, accuracy varies sharply, from GLM-5.1 at 72.29% to Llama-3.370B at 24.24%. The paternal-lineage advantage is language specific; it is large in Hindi but weak or reversed in Korean, while Tamil shared-term pairs provide a control for measurement variation. These results show that culturally specific kinship generation remains difficult even when the relationship is explicitly stated and motivate generation-based evaluation alongside multiple-choice testing.

Comments: Accepted at (ORACLE Workshop), EMNLP 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.26942 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.26942v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26942

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Madhusudan Singh Ph.D. [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:30:09 UTC (29 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Recognized but Not Produced: A Generation Benchmark for Culturally Specific Kinship Terms, by Sahil Pardasani and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.26942v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current literature evaluates large language models (LLMs) on multilingual kinship understanding using multiple choice benchmarks, t…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.