Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning

Summary

This paper introduces ReAPO, a simple modification to GRPO derived from viewing credit assignment through the lens of Stochastic Shortest Paths. ReAPO allocates additional generation to failed trajectories so that successful retries are reinforced without rewarding preceding failures, assigning credit to each attempt in a theoretically principled way. Across Qwen3 and OLMo-2 models from 0.6B to 4B and eight mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks, ReAPO improves first-attempt performance over GRPO and recent baselines; on Qwen3-0.6B it matches the peak accuracy of GRPO with twice the group size or twice the training steps using 39% and 31% fewer generated tokens, respectively.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Nghi Dao, Calder Morton-Ferguson, Noah Golowich, Adam Block
ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 20 Oct 2026]

Title:ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning, by Nghi Dao and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:RLVR improves language-model reasoning, but commonly relies on independent stochastic rollouts for exploration, which can repeatedly sample similar failed strategies. Prior work has seen success with approaches that guide exploration by introducing dependence into the sampling process by including incorrect solutions in the context for subsequent attempts. Still, these methods introduce the additional question of how to assign credit to each attempt. We propose to view the credit assignment through the lens of Stochastic Shortest Paths, a framework in classical reinforcement learning that seeks to minimize the expected cumulative cost to reach a terminal state (in our case, a verified successful response). We show that, under suitable simplifying assumptions, this perspective naturally leads to a simple modification to GRPO, which we call Retry-Aware Policy Optimization (ReAPO). ReAPO allocates additional generation to failed trajectories, allowing successful retries to be reinforced without rewarding preceding failures, and assigns credit in a theoretically principled way to each attempt. Across Qwen3 and OLMo-2 models from 0.6B to 4B and eight mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks, ReAPO improves first-attempt performance over GRPO as well as natural recent baseline algorithms, while additional ablations demonstrate the utility of both serial sampling and ReAPO's credit assignment. On Qwen3-0.6B, ReAPO also outperforms GRPO with twice the group size or twice the training steps, reaching their peak accuracy with 39% and 31% fewer generated tokens, respectively. Taken together, our results suggest that ReAPO is a simple yet effective approach for improving LM reasoning performance through improved exploration and retry-aware credit assignment.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.28770 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.28770v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.28770

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Adam B. Block [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:08:29 UTC (251 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning, by Nghi Dao and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI stat stat.ML

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Reframes credit assignment for retries via Stochastic Shortest Paths, yielding a simple GRPO modification
  • Allocates extra generation to failed trajectories, reinforcing successful retries without rewarding prior failures
  • Outperforms GRPO and recent baselines on first-attempt performance across Qwen3 and OLMo-2 (0.6B–4B) on eight math and science benchmarks
  • Ablations confirm both serial sampling and ReAPO's credit assignment help; on Qwen3-0.6B it reaches GRPO's doubled-group-size and doubled-training-step peak accuracy with 39% and 31% fewer tokens

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.