AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

RADIANT-PET: Reasoning-Augmented PET/CT Lesion Segmentation with Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning

RADIANT-PET is a novel reasoning-augmented framework that couples a high-sensitivity voxel-level segmentation model with lesion-level LLM adjudication for accurate lesion segmentation in PET/CT. By converting candidate regions into structured textual descriptions and optionally leveraging radiology reports, the LLM classifies lesions vs. false positives. Reinforcement learning with GRPO optimizes the LLM for correct classification and anatomically concordant site assignment. Evaluated on AutoPET and an OSU cohort, it outperforms image-only baselines, with largest gains when radiology reports are available.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jiasheng Wang, Tanun Jitwatcharakomol, Piyawadee Jongpradubgiat, Simeng Zhu

[2606.28392] RADIANT-PET: Reasoning-Augmented PET/CT Lesion Segmentation with Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning

[Submitted on 23 Jun 2026]

Title:RADIANT-PET: Reasoning-Augmented PET/CT Lesion Segmentation with Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled RADIANT-PET: Reasoning-Augmented PET/CT Lesion Segmentation with Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning, by Jiasheng Wang and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Accurate lesion segmentation in PET/CT is critical for oncology, yet remains challenging because physiologic tracer uptake and artifacts can mimic malignant signal. We present RADIANT-PET, a reasoning-augmented framework that couples a high-sensitivity voxel-level segmentation model with lesion-level large language model (LLM) adjudication. Candidate uptake regions are generated with a deliberately permissive segmentation stage, then converted into structured textual descriptions that summarize uptake intensity, morphology, and regional and global anatomical context. An LLM classifies each candidate as true lesion vs. false positive, optionally leveraging the radiology report as additional clinical context. To strengthen lesion-level reasoning, we further optimize a local LLM via reinforcement learning using Group Relative Policy Optimization, rewarding correct lesion classification and anatomically concordant site assignment. Across AutoPET and an OSU test cohort, RADIANT-PET consistently outperforms strong image-only baselines, with the largest improvements observed when radiology reports are provided. Overall, these results demonstrate that LLM-based lesion-level reasoning adds a novel reasoning layer beyond conventional segmentation, suppressing physiologic false positives and aligning voxel-level predictions with clinical interpretation. The project repository is available at: this https URL.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.28392 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2606.28392v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.28392

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Simeng Zhu [view email] [v1] Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:05:55 UTC (408 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled RADIANT-PET: Reasoning-Augmented PET/CT Lesion Segmentation with Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning, by Jiasheng Wang and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)