Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Query2Uncertainty: Robust Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration for 3D Object Detection under Distribution Shift

Summary

A density-aware calibration method using latent query features from DETR-style detectors to jointly recalibrate classification and regression uncertainties under distribution shift, consistently outperforming standard post-hoc methods on both camera and LiDAR detectors.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Till Beemelmanns, Alexey Nekrasov, Stefan Vilceanu, Jonas Steinhaus, Timo Woopen, Bastian Leibe, Lutz Eckstein
Query2Uncertainty: Robust Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration for 3D Object Detection under Distribution Shift
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.05328] Query2Uncertainty: Robust Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration for 3D Object Detection under Distribution Shift

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.05328

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2605.05328 (cs)

[Submitted on 6 May 2026]

Title:Query2Uncertainty: Robust Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration for 3D Object Detection under Distribution Shift

Authors:Till Beemelmanns, Alexey Nekrasov, Stefan Vilceanu, Jonas Steinhaus, Timo Woopen, Bastian Leibe, Lutz Eckstein

View a PDF of the paper titled Query2Uncertainty: Robust Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration for 3D Object Detection under Distribution Shift, by Till Beemelmanns and 6 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Reliable uncertainty estimation for 3D object detection is critical for deploying safe autonomous systems, yet modern detectors remain poorly calibrated, especially under distribution shifts. Although post-hoc calibration methods address this issue and provide improved calibration for in-distribution tests, they fail to adapt in distribution-shifted scenarios. In this work, we address this issue and introduce a density-aware calibration method that couples post-hoc calibrators with the feature density of latent object queries from DETR-style 3D object detectors. These queries form a compact, location and class-aware feature, ideal for density estimation, allowing our approach to adjust model confidences in distribution-shift scenarios. By fitting a density estimator on these query features, our approach jointly recalibrates both classification and bounding box regression uncertainties. On both a multi-view camera and LiDAR-based detector, our approach consistently outperforms standard post-hoc methods in both in-distribution and distribution-shifted scenarios. Code available this https URL .

Comments: Accepted for publication at CVPR 2026

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.05328 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.05328v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05328

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Till Beemelmanns [view email] [v1] Wed, 6 May 2026 18:01:19 UTC (14,466 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Query2Uncertainty: Robust Uncertainty Quantification and Calibration for 3D Object Detection under Distribution Shift, by Till Beemelmanns and 6 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.RO

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Modern 3D detectors are poorly calibrated under distribution shifts; existing post-hoc methods fail to adapt.
  • Proposed density-aware method couples post-hoc calibrators with density of latent object queries for recalibration.
  • Outperforms standard methods on both multi-view camera and LiDAR-based detectors.
  • Code is open-sourced; paper accepted at CVPR 2026.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.