Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Queering the Audits: Community-Based Auditing of AI Harms to Queer Communities

Summary

A paper for the Identity Aware AI workshop at LREC 2026 reports on a participatory auditing workshop at EurIPS 2025, where 16 queer community members used the 4Cs harm taxonomy to audit four case studies across the AI lifecycle, tracing harms to problem definition and data collection and flagging extractive contractual structures.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Organizers of QueerInAI, :, A Pranav, Alissa A. Valentine, Alex Markham, Beckett LeClair, Tereza Blazkova, Ekaterina Kornilitsina, Sofie H. Bruun, Gerasimos Spanakis, Anne Lauscher
Queering the Audits: Community-Based Auditing of AI Harms to Queer Communities
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Oct 2026]

Title:Queering the Audits: Community-Based Auditing of AI Harms to Queer Communities

View a PDF of the paper titled Queering the Audits: Community-Based Auditing of AI Harms to Queer Communities, by Organizers of QueerInAI: A Pranav and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:AI systems embed majority-group defaults into training data, evaluation metrics, and category definitions, producing documented harms for queer communities including erasure, misclassification, and discrimination. Standard technical audits often rely on aggregate measures and cannot detect harms that be come visible only through the lived experience of affected communities. We conducted a participatory auditing workshop at EurIPS 2025 where 16 queer community members audited four case studies using the 4Cs harm taxonomy (Content, Conduct, Contact, Contract) applied across the AI lifecycle. Participants used structured worksheets and plenary synthesis to classify harms and trace them to their origins in the development pipeline. Across all four cases, participants traced harms to problem definition and data collection, and they identified contractual structures that extract value from vulnerable populations while providing minimal recourse. These findings illustrate that community-informed auditing surfaces concrete, identity-specific harms that aggregate evaluation methods risk overlooking.

Comments: Published in Identity Aware AI workshop at LREC 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.00345 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2611.00345v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.00345

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Journal reference: In Proceedings of the Second Workshop of Identity Aware AI at 2026, pages 66-76, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. European Language Resources Association

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63317/5acrwqmesyw4

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: A Pranav [view email] [v1] Fri, 30 Oct 2026 20:26:03 UTC (405 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Queering the Audits: Community-Based Auditing of AI Harms to Queer Communities, by Organizers of QueerInAI: A Pranav and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CY

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • A participatory auditing workshop at EurIPS 2025 involved 16 queer community members auditing four case studies.
  • Participants applied the 4Cs harm taxonomy (Content, Conduct, Contact, Contract) across the AI lifecycle.
  • In all four cases, harms were traced back to problem definition and data collection.
  • Participants identified contractual structures that extract value from vulnerable populations with minimal recourse.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Queering the Audits: Community-Based Auditing of AI Harms to Queer Communities | AI News Hub