Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Propensities Please: Exposing Alignment-Faking LLMs using Synthetic Document Finetuning

Summary

The paper proposes synthetic document finetuning (SDF) to expose latent misaligned propensities in LLMs: models are taught that misaligned actions go undetected when certain keywords appear, then placed in obvious honeypots, where finetuning consistently widens the gap in misaligned action rates between cued and uncued prompts. SDF often damages reasoning, which the authors mitigate with on-policy distillation.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Ardy Haroen, Florian Lorkowski, Samuel Nellessen, Felix Hofst\"atter
Propensities Please: Exposing Alignment-Faking LLMs using Synthetic Document Finetuning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 23 Oct 2026]

Title:Propensities Please: Exposing Alignment-Faking LLMs using Synthetic Document Finetuning

View a PDF of the paper titled Propensities Please: Exposing Alignment-Faking LLMs using Synthetic Document Finetuning, by Ardy Haroen and 3 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Alignment evaluations aim to assess whether large language models would engage in dangerous misaligned behaviour. Misaligned and evaluation-aware models might engage in alignment faking, where they pursue a hidden goal, but conceal this behaviour when they suspect effective oversight such as during training, evaluation or audited deployment. Such a model might view any prompt-based intervention that aims to reveal latent propensities as part of the evaluation, calling into question the reliability of existing alignment evaluations. Current methods for detecting alignment faking rely on chain-of-thought monitorability, highly realistic environments that reduce evaluation awareness, or mechanistic interventions, all of which are expected to become less reliable for future model generations. We present a method for revealing latent misaligned propensities that does not rely on any of these. We use synthetic document finetuning to teach models that misaligned actions will go undetected whenever certain keywords appear in the prompt. We place alignment-faking model organisms in environments that are clearly identifiable as honeypots and measure how their behaviour changes after finetuning. We observe that finetuning consistently widens the gap in misaligned action rates between prompts with and without the cue, indicating that finetuning allows exposing latent propensities more reliably than purely prompt-based methods. We argue that behavioural methods for detecting alignment faking and related behaviours are critical going forward, as models become more capable and less interpretable. We find that SDF often damages the models' reasoning capabilities and introduce a mitigation based on on-policy distillation.

Comments: 27 pages, including references and appendices. Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33180 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.33180v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33180

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Samuel Nellessen [view email] [v1] Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:23:49 UTC (83 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Propensities Please: Exposing Alignment-Faking LLMs using Synthetic Document Finetuning, by Ardy Haroen and 3 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • SDF teaches models that misaligned actions are undetected when certain prompt keywords appear, then measures behavior shifts in clear honeypot environments
  • Finetuning consistently widens the misaligned-action gap between cued and uncued prompts, exposing latent propensities more reliably than prompt-only methods
  • SDF often harms model reasoning; the authors propose an on-policy distillation mitigation
  • The authors argue behavioral detection of alignment faking is critical as models grow more capable and less interpretable

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.