Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation

Summary

PrismFlow introduces a novel flow matching method that uses Koopman-inspired dynamical experts to correct estimator smoothing in standard flow matching, recovering high-frequency and fine-grained temporal structures. It achieves state-of-the-art performance with 15.6% gain in Context-FID and 38.6% improvement in Discriminative Score.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Junru Zhang, Lang Feng, Jinbo Wang, Xu Guo, Yucheng Wang, Han Yu, Min Wu, Yabo Dong, Duanqing Xu
PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.28867] PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation

[Submitted on 22 May 2026]

Title:PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation

View a PDF of the paper titled PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation, by Junru Zhang and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Generating high-quality time-series data is challenging because real-world signals often exhibit multimodal patterns and multiscale dynamics, including oscillations and high-frequency variations. Flow Matching (FM) offers an efficient alternative to diffusion models, but practical implementations typically rely on a single finite-capacity global vector-field estimator. In such heterogeneous temporal distributions, distinct regimes may pass through nearby flow states while requiring incompatible conditional velocities. A monolithic estimator trained with the standard $\ell_2$ velocity-matching objective may therefore learn an overly smoothed approximation of the local transport field. This estimator-level smoothing can attenuate branch-specific dynamics, leading to spectral distortion and poor mode coverage. To address this, we propose PrismFlow, a new FM method with Koopman-inspired dynamical experts. Each expert learns residual corrections in a latent space where local nonlinear temporal evolution can be approximated by linear transitions. We further propose a confidence-aware Winner-Take-All (WTA) objective that updates only the expert best aligned with each sample while masking gradients to the others, encouraging mode-specific specialization. During sampling, the selected expert adds a residual dynamical correction to the global transport field, preserving FM stability while recovering fine-grained and high-frequency temporal structures. Across various benchmarks, PrismFlow effectively mitigates the spectral contraction in standard FM and achieves state-of-the-art performance, with a 15.6% gain in Context-FID and a 38.6% improvement in Discriminative Score, while remaining robust in low-data settings and effective for forecasting and imputation.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.28867 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.28867v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28867

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Junru Zhang [view email] [v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 07:10:20 UTC (25,065 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation, by Junru Zhang and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Standard flow matching uses a single global vector-field estimator, causing over-smoothing and spectral distortion in heterogeneous temporal distributions.
  • PrismFlow introduces Koopman-inspired dynamical experts that learn residual corrections in a latent space to capture local nonlinear dynamics.
  • A confidence-aware Winner-Take-All objective promotes expert specialization, adding corrections during sampling while preserving FM stability.
  • Achieves SOTA on multiple benchmarks: 15.6% Context-FID gain, 38.6% Discriminative Score improvement, robust in low-data settings.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.