Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Prediction Is Not Calibration: Item Parameter Recovery and Representation Coupling in Knowledge Tracing

Summary

arXiv:2610.30211v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge tracing (KT) models can estimate item parameters through an item response decoder trained solely for next-response prediction, yet predictive accuracy does not guarantee parameter recovery. We study 2PL, GPCM, and NRM decoders paired with LSTM, Transformer, and DKVMN encoders. Response-model derivatives show why discrimination and option slope updates depend directly on the scale and spread of estimated ability. Affine logit identities show how item-dependent shifts and rescaling in estimated ability are absorbed into item parameters without changing response probabilities. In simulations, difficulty, mean threshold, and correct-option intercept recovery remain high under shuffled order across representation widths, whereas discrim…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Wenrui Yuan, St\'ephanie M. van den Berg, Johannes Steinr\"ucke
Prediction Is Not Calibration: Item Parameter Recovery and Representation Coupling in Knowledge Tracing
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 21 Oct 2026]

Title:Prediction Is Not Calibration: Item Parameter Recovery and Representation Coupling in Knowledge Tracing

View a PDF of the paper titled Prediction Is Not Calibration: Item Parameter Recovery and Representation Coupling in Knowledge Tracing, by Wenrui Yuan and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Knowledge tracing (KT) models can estimate item parameters through an item response decoder trained solely for next-response prediction, yet predictive accuracy does not guarantee parameter recovery. We study 2PL, GPCM, and NRM decoders paired with LSTM, Transformer, and DKVMN encoders. Response-model derivatives show why discrimination and option slope updates depend directly on the scale and spread of estimated ability. Affine logit identities show how item-dependent shifts and rescaling in estimated ability are absorbed into item parameters without changing response probabilities. In simulations, difficulty, mean threshold, and correct-option intercept recovery remain high under shuffled order across representation widths, whereas discrimination and keyed option slope contrast recovery require wider item representations and degrade further under fixed item order. Separating the sequence item representation (width $d_S$) from the item parameter key (width $d_M$), and pairing a wide key with a thin sequence representation ($\mathrm{SK}(64,8)$), reduces fixed-order ability distortions and improves recovery and cross-order consistency without sacrificing test accuracy or increasing model size relative to a shared width-64 baseline ($\mathrm{SH}(64)$). On TIMSS and EdNet, widening $d_M$ consistently improves agreement with an offline IRT reference, while the trade-off from narrowing $d_S$ depends on the encoder's reliance on sequence width for prediction. These findings show why item parameters, especially discrimination and option slopes, must be evaluated separately from response prediction.

Comments: 46 pages, including appendix

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.30211 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.30211v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30211

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Wenrui Yuan [view email] [v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:40:57 UTC (1,189 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Prediction Is Not Calibration: Item Parameter Recovery and Representation Coupling in Knowledge Tracing, by Wenrui Yuan and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.30211v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge tracing (KT) models can estimate item parameters through an item response decoder trained solely for next-response predic…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.