Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning

Summary

This research proposes a hybrid pre-training objective combining JEPA latent-space prediction loss with standard masked language modeling (MLM) to improve language representations. Experiments show that the hybrid encoder produces more uniform embeddings and better semantic-lexical balance, but similar downstream accuracy to pure MLM.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Aimen Boukhari
Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.05173] Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning

[Submitted on 16 Apr 2026]

Title:Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning, by Aimen Boukhari

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Masked language modelling (MLM) has been the dominant pre-training objective for text encoders since BERT, yet it encourages representations that are strongly anchored to surface-form token identity rather than deeper semantic structure. Inspired by the success of Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPA) (LeCun, 2022) in vision and audio, we propose a hybrid pre-training objective that combines a JEPA-style latent-space prediction loss with a standard MLM objective over a single shared encoder. A learnable scalar parameter continuously balances the two objectives during training. We pre-train both a hybrid model and a pure-MLM baseline on English Wikipedia using identical architectures and compute budgets (NVIDIA H100). Extensive representation analysis across five GLUE benchmarks (SST-2, MRPC, MNLI, CoLA, STS-B) using four pooling strategies reveals that the hybrid encoder produces significantly more uniform embeddings (uniformity less than -0.16 vs -0.05 for MLM), exhibits richer spectral geometry under max pooling, encodes less surface-level lexical information, and achieves a better semantic-to-lexical balance. Despite similar linear-probe downstream accuracy, the geometric differences are consistent and significant, suggesting that the JEPA predictive objective reshapes the latent space in ways that standard accuracy metrics alone cannot capture.

Comments: 12 pages, 10 figures, 11 tables. Preprint. Code available at : this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.05173 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.05173v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05173

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Aimen Boukhari [view email] [v1] Thu, 16 Apr 2026 22:26:47 UTC (1,440 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning, by Aimen Boukhari

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Hybrid objective combines JEPA and MLM with a learnable scalar to balance two losses.
  • Hybrid model exhibits more uniform embeddings and richer spectral geometry on GLUE benchmarks.
  • Standard accuracy metrics fail to capture geometric differences in latent space.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.