AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Position: Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs is Just Unsupervised Clustering

This position paper argues that current uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for large language models (LLMs) suffer from a category error: they are essentially unsupervised clustering algorithms that measure internal consistency rather than factual correctness. The authors identify three critical pathologies: hyperparameter sensitivity, an internal evaluation cycle that conflates stability with truth, and a lack of ground truth leading to reliance on unstable proxies. They call for a paradigm shift toward anchoring UQ in objective truth and propose a research roadmap.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Tiejin Chen, Longchao Da, Xiaoou Liu, Hua Wei

[2605.19220] Position: Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs is Just Unsupervised Clustering

[Submitted on 19 May 2026]

Title:Position: Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs is Just Unsupervised Clustering

View a PDF of the paper titled Position: Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs is Just Unsupervised Clustering, by Tiejin Chen and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is widely regarded as the primary safeguard for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in high-stakes domains. However, we argue that the field suffers from a category error: mainstream UQ methods for LLMs are just unsupervised clustering algorithms. We demonstrate that most current approaches inherently quantify the internal consistency of the model's generations rather than their external correctness. Consequently, current methods are fundamentally blind to factual reality and fail to detect ``confident hallucinations,'' where models exhibit high confidence in stable but incorrect answers. Therefore, the current UQ methods may create a deceptive sense of safety when deploying the models with uncertainty. In detail, we identify three critical pathologies resulting from this dependence on internal state: a hyperparameter sensitivity crisis that renders deployment unsafe, an internal evaluation cycle that conflates stability with truth, and a fundamental lack of ground truth that forces reliance on unstable proxy metrics to evaluate uncertainty. To resolve this impasse, we advocate for a paradigm shift to UQ and outline a roadmap for the research community to adopt better evaluation metrics and settings, implement mechanism changes for native uncertainty, and anchor verification in objective truth, ensuring that model confidence serves as a reliable proxy for reality.

Comments: Accepted by ICML 2026 Position Paper Track

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

MSC classes: 68T50, 68T37, 68Q32

ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.6; I.2.4

Cite as: arXiv:2605.19220 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.19220v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19220

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hua Wei [view email] [v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 00:47:02 UTC (607 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Position: Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs is Just Unsupervised Clustering, by Tiejin Chen and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)